NEW SERIES RELEASE MONETARY MALPRACTICE AVAILABLE NOW MONETARY MALPRACTICE: Deceptions, Distortions and Delusions MONETARY MALPRACTICE: Moral Malady MONETARY MALPRACTICE: Dysfunctional Markets
NOW SHOWING HELD OVER Currency Wars Euro Experiment Sultans of Swap Extend & Pretend Preserve & Protect Innovation Showings Below
FREE COPY... Current Thesis Advisory: CONTACT US
|
Weekend Apr. 13th , 2013 |
![]() "Something for Nothing Societies" ATTACK OF THE LOCUSTS - Part II Tuesday 04-09-13 What Are Tipping Poinits? |
![]()
Reading the right books? >> Click to Browse << We have analyzed & included Book Review- Five Thumbs Up
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"BEST OF THE WEEK " |
Posting Date |
Labels & Tags | TIPPING POINT or 2013 THESIS THEME |
HOTTEST TIPPING POINTS |
Theme Groupings |
||
![]() |
|||
MOST CRITICAL TIPPING POINT ARTICLES TODAY | |||
CHINESE GOLD IMPORTS - Rate through Hong Kong |
04-13-13 | DRIVER$ GOLD |
ANALYTICS |
US HOUSING - Rate of Mortgage Application Increase Rolling Over Still Think The Housing Recovery Is Sustainable? 04-11-13 Zero Hedge While hope springs eternal that the US housing sector 'record-inventory-compression and foreclosure-stuffed' 'recovery' will become self-sustaining, there are two rather disappointing 'facts' to ruin the 'fiction' that all is well. As Gluskin Sheff's David Rosenberg notes, not only are mortgage applications for new purchases stalling rather notably from a 'red-hot' +16% YoY in January to a mere +3% in the last week; but an even more critical indicator of housing's health just turned negative after providing hope for the last 14 months. The year-over-year growth in bank-wide real estate credit has turned down again - after first turning positive in February of 2012. So the first (and second) derivative of real-estate credit is now on the down-swing - not the stuff of sustainable housing recoveries. Mortgage applications for new home purchases are fading fast... But real estate loans outstanding is now negative YoY and falling... Charts: Bloomberg |
04-13-12 | INDICATORS CATALYST RESIDENTIAL |
15 - Residential Real Estate - Phase II |
US HOUSING - Recovery Misleading Cheap Mortgages: Misleading Home Price Watchers 04-11-13 Ritholtz
Nice piece in Business Week explaining how ultra low mortgage rates are creating a misleading sense of the housing market . . . Source: |
04-13-12 | INDICATORS CATALYST RESIDENTIAL |
15 - Residential Real Estate - Phase II |
PE RATIO - A Long Term Adjustment Process Broad Market Lagged Price to Earnings Ratio 04-11-13 Ritholtz Source:
|
04-12-13 | FUNDAMENTALS VALUATIONS PE |
ANALYTICS |
PATTERNS - A Historic Short Squeeze A VERY TIGHT CHANNEL WHY - RELENTLESS SHORT SQUEEZE The 'most shorted' names in the Russell 3000 are up a remarkable 1.4% today compared to 0.45% in the index itself. The short-squeeze off the NFP gap-down lows is impressive indeed. From the open last Friday, the 'most short' names are up 6.6% against the index up only 3.5% as the dash for trash continues in the face of increasingly dismal data. The last 2 times that the 'most short' index was this squeezed relative to the index was late-December (before the equity dip) and mid-Fed (before the equity dip). Just as we warned here and here, the inexorable flow of easy money means the dash-for-trash (as remarkably ridiculous as it seems - though as now know nothing is allowed to fail ever again) has been the winning trade; though as we note below, there is a limit to the 'squeezability' and we appear to be there in the short term. The 'most short' names have been smashed higher in the last few days with Tuesday and today being more epic squeezes... and the last two times the squeeze got this wide...
But it is remarkable that this rally has provided a 30% rally off the November lows among the most-shorted names - almost double the performance of the index itself... Finally, for those who missed it the first time around in February (since when the basket has returned well over 10%), here again are the most shorted Russell 2000 stocks: TABLE
|
04-12-13 | PATTERNS |
ANALYTICS |
Carmen Reinhart: "No Doubt. Our Pensions Are Screwed." 04-11-13 Zero Hedge "The crisis isn't over yet," warns Carmen Reinhart, "not in the US and not in Europe." Known for her deep understanding that 'it's never different this time', the Harvard economist drops the truth grenade a number of times in this excellent Der Spiegel interview. Sweeping away the sound and fury of a self-serving Federal Reserve or BoJ, she chides, "no central bank will admit it is keeping rates low to help governments out of their debt crises. But in fact they are bending over backwards to help governments to finance their deficits," and guess what, "this is nothing new in history." After World War II, all countries that had a big debt overhang relied on financial repression to avoid an explicit default. After the war, governments imposed interest rate ceilings for government bonds; but, nowadays, she explains, "monetary policy is doing the job. And with high unemployment and low inflation that doesn't even look suspicious. Only when inflation picks up, which is ultimately going to happen, will it become obvious that central banks have become subservient to governments." Nations "seldom just grow themselves out of debt," as so many believe is possible, "you need a combination of austerity, so that you don't add further to the pile of debt, and higher inflation, which is effectively a subtle form of taxation," with the consequence that people are going to lose their savings. Reinhart succinctly summarizes, "no doubt, our pensions are screwed." This will take 3 minutes to read - read it. Understand what she is saying. ... governments are incapable of reducing their debts and that central banks are now stepping up to resolve the crisis themselves. In the end, she argues, everyday savers will pay the price. ... SPIEGEL: Ms. Reinhart, central banks around the world are flooding the markets with cheap money in order to spur economies and support governments. Are these institutions losing their independence? Reinhart: No central bank will admit it is keeping rates low to help governments out of their debt crises. But in fact they are bending over backwards to help governments to finance their deficits. This is nothing new in history. After World War II, there was a long phase in which central banks were subservient to governments. It has only been since the 1970s that they have become politically more independent. The pendulum seems to be swinging back as a result of the financial crisis. SPIEGEL: Is that true of the European Central Bank as well? Reinhart: Less than for other central banks, but yes. And the crisis isn't over yet -- not in the United States and not in Europe. SPIEGEL: But the danger of such a central bank policy is already well known: It can lead to high inflation. Reinhart: True. But it is certainly more difficult for a central banker to raise interest rates with a debt to gross domestic product ratio of over 100 percent than it is when this ratio stands at 39 percent. Therefore, I believe the shift towards less independence of monetary policy is not just a temporary change. SPIEGEL: As a historian who knows the potential long-term consequences very well, doesn't such short-sighted decision-making frighten you? Reinhart: I am not opposing this change, I am just stating it. You have to deal with the debt overhang one way or the other because the high debt levels are an impediment to growth, they paralyze the financial system and the credit process. One way to cope with this is to write off part of the debt. SPIEGEL: You mean some kind of haircut? Reinhart: Yes. But we are in an environment where politicians are very reluctant to do write-offs. So what happens is that money is transferred from savers to borrowers via negative interest rates. SPIEGEL: In other words: When the inflation rate is higher than the interest rates paid on the markets, the debts shrink as if by magic. The downside, though, is that this applies to the savings of normal people. Reinhart: The technical term for this is financial repression. After World War II, all countries that had a big debt overhang relied on financial repression to avoid an explicit default. After the war, governments imposed interest rate ceilings for government bonds. Nowadays they have more sophisticated means. SPIEGEL: Which means? Reinhart: Monetary policy is doing the job. And with high unemployment and low inflation that doesn't even look suspicious. Only when inflation picks up, which is ultimately going to happen, will it become obvious that central banks have become subservient to governments. SPIEGEL: Do you think it is wrong for Europe to focus on austerity measures with inflation at such a low level? Reinhart: No. Restructuring, inflation und financial repression are not substitutes for austerity. All these measures reduce your existing stock of debt. Unless you do austerity you keep adding to the debt. There is no either-or. You need a combination of both to bring down debt to a sustainable level. SPIEGEL: Is the new trend in monetary policies a good way of tackling debt problems? Reinhart: There are no silver bullets. If central banks try to accommodate and buy debt, there are risks associated with it. Somewhere down the road you are going to wind up with higher inflation. That is a safe bet -- even in Japan … SPIEGEL: … which is currently dealing with the opposite phenomenon: deflation with sinking prices. Reinhart: A further risk of such policies is that efforts to save will be delayed. SPIEGEL: So what should be done? Reinhart: The best way of dealing with a debt overhang is to never get into one. Once you have one, what can you do? You can pray for higher growth, but good luck! Historically it doesn't happen -- you seldom just grow yourself out of debt. You need a combination of austerity, so that you don't add further to the pile of debt, and higher inflation, which is effectively a subtle form of taxation … SPIEGEL: … with the consequence that people are going to lose their savings? Reinhart: No doubt, pensions are screwed. Governments have a lot of leverage on what kinds of assets pension funds hold. In France, for example, public pension funds have shifted money from shares (on the stock market) to government bonds. Not because their returns are great, but because it is more expedient for the government. Pension funds, domestic banks and insurance companies are the most captive audiences, because governments can just change the rules of the game. SPIEGEL: We have seen 50 years of peace and democracy in Europe, but also 50 years of rising debt. Are democracies incapable of setting a budget and sticking to it? Reinhart: No, but after World War II austerity was easier to pursue, because you had a younger population and therefore less entitlements. Furthermore, military expenditure was easier to reduce. So, the build-up in debt we have seen since the crisis is very rare. Usually you get that kind of build-up when there is a war. SPIEGEL: But is it not a declaration of bankruptcy for democracy if central bankers, who haven't even been elected, have to step in to fix the problem in the end? Reinhart: I think the biggest mistake that European policy-makers are now making is not to put debt restructuring more explicitly on the table. SPIEGEL: Are you referring to Greece? Reinhart: Greece has had its restructuring, that's history. But look at Ireland and Spain. Private senior bank debt has not been written off, despite the fact that underlying asset prices in those countries have collapsed and are still collapsing. SPIEGEL: So closures of some banks would be helpful? Reinhart: What is sacrosanct about bank debt? SPIEGEL: Well, the bankruptcy of banks can have a considerable effect on the financial system. Reinhart: Let me be a little blunter: A haircut is a transfer from the creditor to the borrower. Who would get hit by a haircut? French banks, German banks, Dutch banks -- banks from the creditor countries. So you can see why this is politically torched. This is why it is not done, it's a redistribution. But ultimately it is going to happen, because the level of debt is too high. SPIEGEL: The United States is very highly indebted as well. Reinhart: Yes, but who are the large holders of government bonds? Foreign central banks. You think the Bank of China is going to be repaid? The US doesn't have to default explicitly. If you have negative real interest rates, the effect on the creditors is the same. That is also a transfer from China, South Korea, Brazil and other creditors to the US. SPIEGEL: And what happens if the creditors don't continue to play along and the interest rates on American government bonds climb? Do you see the danger of a debt crisis in the US? Reinhart: Why do we have such low interest rates? The Federal Reserve Bank is prepared to continue buying record levels of debt as long as the unemployment situation isn't satisfying. And China's central bank will also continue to buy treasuries, because they don't want the renminbi to appreciate. SPIEGEL: That sounds like a perpetual motion … Reinhart: ... of course it is!
|
04-12-13 | THESIS | MOST CRITICAL TIPPING POINT ARTICLES THIS WEEK -Apr 7th - Apr 13th 2013 |
RISK REVERSAL | 1 | ||
JAPAN - DEBT DEFLATION | 2 | ||
BOND BUBBLE | 3 | ||
EU BANKING CRISIS |
4 |
||
SOVEREIGN DEBT CRISIS [Euope Crisis Tracker] | 5 | ||
PORTUGAL - Courts Blow Planned Austerity Apart Two Weekend Developments: Portugal and Italy 04-07-13 Marc To Market via ZH NEED TO KNOW
The implications can be momentous.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the government was considering several measures in response. The one that was capturing the imagination of many was the possibility of paying civil servant workers and pensioners one month's salary in the form of T-bills. The press report suggests that doing so would save the government as much as 1.1 bln euros in expenses. Portugal Considers Paying Public Workers In Treasury Bills Instead Of Cash Zero Hedge As reported late on Friday, just as the market closed, the Portuguese constitutional court decided that several provisions of the country's 2013 budget were not constitutional. According to the high court, cuts in wages and pensions of public employees were unfair (there's that word again) because they targeted only the public sector. The court rejected plans to cut one of the 14 paychecks that public workers usually get each year and to slash 6.4% from pensions for retirees. This coincided with the government warning that the court's decision would put into question the country's ability to fulfill its €78 billion international bailout program, which in turn would send bondholders of Portuguese sovereign debt scrambling for the exits as suddenly the country may find itself in the ECB's "dunce" corner, with Draghi preparing to pull a "Berlusconi" on a government which can't even whip its judicial branch in line. However, of more immediate concern is how will the government now plug a hole of up to €1.3 billion in its €5.3 billion 2013 budget. A solution has, luckily, presented itself: bypass the unconstitutional provisions by paying government workers not in cash, but in government bills!
Incidentally, this plan makes perfect sense: with every central bank openly monetizing its debt, it has effectively made debt and cash equivalent. Now if only Portuguese public workers had access to the same shadow transformation pathways and government bond repo collateralization opportunities afforded to the big banks, then every bill thus obtained would be able to serve as a source of nearly infinite rehypothecation potential, and thus, a DIY fractional reserve banking system provided to every individual. Coming next: the full convertibility of Spanish Spiderman towels backed by the full faith and credit of the Rajoy kickback scandal, and fully convertible into chorizo. All joking aside, the fact that this absurd option is even being contemplated shows just how deep into the rabbit hole event horizon the modern completely insolvent financial system has traversed. |
04-08-13 | EU PORTUGAL |
5- Sovereign Debt Crisis |
CHINA BUBBLE | 6 | ||
EMPLOYMENT - 110M Working Age Americans Not Working Unemployment Rate Drops on Declining Participation 04-08-13 AlphaNOW The headline US unemployment rate fell to 7.6% in March as a 206k decline in employment on the household survey was more than offset by a 496k drop in the size of the labour force. As a result, the participation rate fell to 63.3% – its lowest level since 1979. If participation had remained flat in March, the unemployment rate would have actually increased. If it was unchanged over the past five years, the unemployment rate would now be 11.5%. The US population can be decomposed in three: 1. The employed: people who have jobs; Many tend to associate a falling unemployment rate with strong employment growth. But that need not be the case. The unemployment rate is calculated by looking at the level of joblessness relative to the size of the labour force. Should those who are out of work opt not to seek employment, the unemployment rate will decline, without any necessary improvement in labour market conditions. That is what happened in the most recent payrolls report. Total employment, on the household measure, actually fell in March, by 206k. But the size of the labour force fell more quickly – by 496k. Without this decline in the participation rate, unemployment would have actually risen from 7.7% to 7.9%. Instead, it fell to 7.6%. Over the past five years the participation rate has fallen from 66.1% to 63.3%. Had it remained flat over this period, all things being equal, the unemployment rate would be 11.5%. It should be noted that the participation rate has been on a downward trend since the turn of the century, and some of this is related to the ageing population. We estimate that demographics alone are acting to lower the participation rate by at least 0.2 percentage points each year. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve forecasts that this will increase to 0.3 percentage points in the coming decade. The annual decline over the past five years, however, has been almost double that. This suggests that some of the current weakness has been driven by cyclical forces. What happens to this ratio as we move forward? It is to be hoped that many of the non-participants will have used their time out of the labour force to improve their skills, perhaps by pursuing further education. If the jobs market continues to recover, this cohort should eventually begin to seek work once again. While this would put upward pressure on the unemployment rate, it should be welcomed. The potential benefits to growth and social cohesion far outweigh any temporarily sticky headline jobless numbers. |
7 - Chronic Unemployment | ||
PUBLIC POLICY - Misdirected Policy Leads to Economic Stagnation The Country Is Over Monty Pelerin's World blog, via ZHNEED TO KNOW
|
04-08-13 | US PUBLIC |
10 - Chronic Global Fiscal ImBalances |
TO TOP | |||
MACRO News Items of Importance - This Week | |||
GLOBAL MACRO REPORTS & ANALYSIS |
|||
GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS - Balance Sheeet Expansion versus CPI |
GLOBAL MACRO |
||
GLOBAL INDICATORS - Macro Surprises Tell the Story US Macro Data Plunges Most In 10 Months 04-05-13 Zero Hedge The last two weeks have not been pretty for the 'it's different this time' crowd. Day after day has brought miss after miss in macro-economic data for the US; from PMIs to NFPs, no matter how hard you try, there is not even enough for an 'anecdotal' strategist to pin his BTFD thesis on. Quantitatively, the US macro surprise index has seen its biggest 10-day drop in 10 months, completely reversing all the 'seasonally-adjusted' difference from the 2011 'Deja-Vu' market and macro behavior. So with the first pillar of bullishness (macro data is 'supportive'), it is up to earnings (but but but profitability is at highs) to hold up the market - good luck with that. Biggest 2-week drop in macro data in 10 months... is reverting all the 'seasonally adjusted' green shoots that made this time different from last year... and once again, just for fun, someone explain how the market is not solely dependent upon the Fed for this to occur? Charts: Bloomberg |
04-08-13 | STUDY
GLOBAL INDICATORS GROWTH |
GLOBAL MACRO |
US ECONOMIC REPORTS & ANALYSIS |
|||
PUBLIC POLICY - Failure of Economic Policy This is Not A Rally...It's a Credit Bubble of Epic Proportions 04-08-13 InsideInvesting Daily An explosive rise in asset prices always generates concern that a bubble may be developing and that its bursting might lead to broad and deep economic distress. – Fed governor Frederic Mishkin, August 2007 On Friday, the Bank of Japan ushered in a new era of monetary stimulus. Under new governor Haruhiko Kuroda... and under massive pressure from new prime minister Shinzo Abe... the BoJ promised a $1.4 trillion debt monetization program. This will start next year and will double the country's monetary base (currency in the hands of the public plus commercial bank deposits at the Bank of Japan). Following the news, the Nikkei 225 ended the session up +1.6%. The yen fell more than -2% versus the dollar... and -4% versus the euro. And the yield on the 10-year JGB hit a record low. We are in unchartered territory regarding monetary easing. We are living through a giant academic-led monetary experiment – the largest in history by far – that is being pursued without regard for the potential for nasty unintended consequences. The central banks of the "big three" developed economies – the US, the EU and Japan – are now committed to doing "whatever it takes" to keep bond yields low. They have no choice. If yields go higher, stock market gains will evaporate and rising interest costs on sovereign debt would put huge pressure on governments. We would see another giant asset bubble deflate and have no monetary "ammo" in reserve to ease the pain it would cause. Relative to the size of its economy, the BoJ's stimulus plan is now even more intense than the Fed's. As Japan bond bear Kyle Bass points out, "The BoJ is now monetizing at a rate around 75% of the Fed on an economy that is one-third the size of the US." NOT REACHING MAINSTREAM What many don't understand... or don't want to see... is that in Japan (and in the US), this stimulus is not reaching "Main Street" by way of bank lending. Although monetary base is rising, wider measures of money supply have been flat or are falling. This means that credit easing ends up exclusively boosting asset prices (most notably, equities) by way of
But the fundamentals are not keeping up... As former Reagan budget advisor David Stockman pointed out in a recent piece in The New York Times, "State-Wrecked: The Corruption of Capital in America":
Of course, Stockman's views have gone down like a lead balloon in the corridors of power and in the mainstream media – which abhor his hard-money views and which cling to a painless Keynesian solution to the 2008 credit collapse. What should you do in the current environment? Exercise extreme caution. Try to
As barometers go, stock markets, under conditions of high levels of margin borrowing and other forms of leverage, are less than perfect. Otherwise, the much-feted 1929 rally would not have happened – a full year after commodity price deflation had set in. Fast-forward to 2013, and we see that the three best-performing sectors in the US equity rally are the anti-cyclical and defensive health care, consumer staples and utilities (with an average year-to-date gain of 14%). The three worst-performing sectors are the highly cyclical and growth-sensitive materials, tech and energy (with an average year-to-date gain of less than 3%). This is not a rally. It's a credit bubble of epic proportions. |
04-10-13 | PUBLIC POLICY |
US ECONOMY |
US MACRO - Divergence Supports "Rolling-Over" Pattern US Macro Data Plunges Most In 10 Months 04-05-13 Zero Hedge The last two weeks have not been pretty for the 'it's different this time' crowd. Day after day has brough miss after miss in macro-economic data for the US; from PMIs to NFPs, no matter how hard you try, there is not even enough for an 'anecdotal' strategist to pin his BTFD thesis on. Quantitatively, the US macro surprise index has seen its biggest 10-day drop in 10 months, completely reversing all the 'seasonally-adjusted' difference from the 2011 'Deja-Vu' market and macro behavior. So with the first pillar of bullishness (macro data is 'supportive'), it is up to earnings (but but but profitability is at highs) to hold up the market - good luck with that. Biggest 2-week drop in macro data in 10 months... is reverting all the 'seasonally adjusted' green shoots that made this time different from last year... and once again, just for fun, someone explain how the market is not solely dependent upon the Fed for this to occur? Charts: Bloomberg |
04-09-13 | STUDY | US ECONOMICS |
FALSE ECONOMIC DATA - The Archilles Heels of the Deception NEED TO KNOW
Source: Weekly US Product of Finished Motor Gasoline (EIA), and Total Petroleum Product (EIA). The same disturbing story is revealed when looking at various other EIA charts of sales, and thus demand, such as this one showing that 52 week average sales and deliveries of gasoline by prime supplier in the US has also tumbled to levels last seen in the late 90's. Source: Total Gasoline All Sales/Deliveries by Prime Supplier (EIA) But maybe it is just the usage of more efficient modes of transportation, and a higher MPG as more Americans shift to electric cars and some such. Sure, maybe. Of course, that would not explain why the total miles driven has hardly budged for the last decade, and is far off the all time high recorded when the economy was indeed humming on all fours, if moments before it imploded in 2007... Source: Moving 12-Month Total Vehicle Miles Traveled (St. Louis Fed FRED) ... but the biggest question we have is just how did the biggest boost in energy and engine efficiency occurred at two key junctions: Just after the Lehman Failure, and just after the US downgrade and the first debt ceiling crisis, when the total sales of gasoline by US retailers literally went off the charts, and which data series is now languishing at levels not seen since the 1970s (unfortunately we can only estimate: not even the EIA's data set goes back that far). Source: US Total Gasoline Retail Sales by Refiners (EIA) Perhaps, just perhaps, Occam's razor applies in this situation as well, and the collapse in energy demand in the US has little to do with MPG efficiency, higher productivity, and throughput mysteriously achieved just when the entire economy was imploding in the months after the Lehman failure, and despite the re-emerging proliferation of cheap Fed debt funded SUVs and small trucks (discussed here), and everything to do with the US consumer being slowly but surely tapped out? Of course, if that is the case, than the US economy is far, far weaker than even we could have surmised, although it certainly would explain the desperation with which the Fed is doing everything in its power to preserve the levitation of the S&P, i.e., the confidence that all is well despite all signs to the contrary. Because should the market finally be allowed to reflect the underlying economy - not the administration represented economy, but the real one - then everything that has transpired in the past five years will be child's play compared to what's coming. |
04-08-13 | US INDICATORS CONSUMPTION |
US ECONOMICS |
CENTRAL BANKING MONETARY POLICIES, ACTIONS & ACTIVITIES | |||
HELICOPTER MONEY - Central Bank Bond Purchases are Forever Helicopter QE will never be reversed 04-03-13 Ambrose Evenas-Pritchard Readers of the Daily Telegraph were right all along. Quantitative easing will never be reversed. It is not liquidity management as claimed so vehemently at the outset. It really is the same as printing money. Columbia Professor Michael Woodford, the world's most closely followed monetary theorist, says it is time to come clean and state openly that bond purchases are forever, and the sooner people understand this the better. "All this talk of exit strategies is deeply negative," he told a London Business School seminar on the merits of Helicopter money, or "overt monetary financing". He said the Bank of Japan made the mistake of reversing all its money creation from 2001 to 2006 once it thought the economy was safely out of the woods. But Japan crashed back into deeper deflation as soon the Lehman crisis hit. "If we are going to scare the horses, let's scare them properly. Let's go further and eliminate government debt on the bloated balance sheet of central banks," he said. This could done with a flick of the fingers. The debt would vanish. Lord Turner, head of the now defunct Financial Services Authority, made the point more delicately. "We must tell people that if necessary, QE will turn out to be permanent." The write-off should cover "previous fiscal deficits", the stock of public debt. It should be "post-facto monetary finance". The policy is elastic, for Lord Turner went on to argue that central banks in the US, Japan and Europe should stand ready to finance current spending as well, if push comes to shove. At least the money would go straight into the veins of the economy, rather than leaking out into asset bubbles. Today's QE relies on pushing down borrowing costs. It is "creditism". That is a very blunt tool in a deleveraging bust when nobody wants to borrow. Lord Turner says the current policy has become dangerous, yielding ever less returns, with ever worsening side-effects. It would be better for central banks to put the money into railways, bridges, clean energy, smart grids, or whatever does most to regenerate the economy. The policy can be "wrapped" in such a way as to preserve central bank independence. The Fed or the Bank of England would decide when enough is enough, or what the proper pace should be, just as they calibrate every tool. That at least is the argument. I merely report it. Lord Turner knows this breaks the ultimate taboo, and that taboos evolve for sound anthropological reasons, but he invokes the doctrine of the lesser evil. "The danger in this environment is that if we deny ourselves this option, people will find other ways of dealing with deflation, and that would be worse." A breakdown of the global trading system might be one, armed conquest or Fascism may be others - or all together, as in the 1930s. There were two extreme episodes of money printing in the inter-war years. The Reichsbank's financing of Weimar deficits from 1922 to 1924 - like lesser variants in France, Belgium and Poland - is well known. The result was hyperinflation. Clever people made hay. The slow-witted - or the patriotic - lost their savings. It was a poisonous dichotomy. Less known is the spectacular success of Takahashi Korekiyo in Japan in the very different circumstances of the early 1930s. He fired a double-barreled blast of monetary and fiscal stimulus together, helped greatly by a 40pc fall in the yen. The Bank of Japan was ordered to fund the public works programme of the government. Within two years, Japan was booming again, the first major country to break free of the Great Depression. Within three years, surging tax revenues allowed Mr Korekiyo to balance the budget. It was magic. This is more or less the essence of "Abenomics", the three-pronged attack on deflation by Japan's new premier and Great Power revivalist Shinzo Abe. Stephen Jen from SLJ Macro Partners says Western analysts have been strangely slow to understand the breathtaking scale of what is under way. The Bank of Japan is already committed to bond purchases of $140bn a month in 2014. This is almost double the US Federal Reserve's net purchases (around $75bn a month), and five times as much as a share of GDP. Prof Woodford and Lord Turner both think the Fed has already begun to monetise America's deficits, though Ben Bernanke has been studiously vague whenever pressed in testimony on Capitol Hill. These are early days. It is tentative and deniable. The great hope is that this weird episode will soon be behind us, and that such shock therapy will never be needed in the end. If stock markets tell the truth, the world economy is already healing itself. Another full cycle of global growth is safely under way. But stock markets are a bad barometer at the onset of every crisis, not least the blistering rally of late 1929, a full year after the world economy had tipped into commodity deflation. The Reuters CRB commodity index has been falling steadily for the past six months. Copper futures have dropped 10pc since mid-February. This is nothing like the early months of the great global boom a decade ago. The bull case rests on US recovery, a seductive story as the housing market comes back to life and the shale boom revives the US chemical industry. Yet the US money supply figures are no longer flashing buy signals. The M2 money stock has contracted over the past three months, and M2 velocity has dropped to the lowest ever recorded at 1.54. The country must navigate a fiscal squeeze worth 2.5pc of GDP over the rest of the year, arguably the biggest fiscal shock in half a century. Five key indicators have been soft over the past week, with the ADP jobs index coming in much weaker than expected on Wednesday. Growth is below the Fed's "stall speed" indicator, an annualized two-quarter rate of 2pc. The buoyancy over the past quarter has been flattered by a collapse in the US savings rate to pre-Lehman depths of 2.6pc, and while falling saving is what the world needs, it is not what America needs. Thrifty Asians are the people who must spend if we are to right the collosal imbalances in the global system. The world savings rate is still climbing to fresh records above 25pc. For all the talk of change in China, Beijing is still pursuing a mercantilist policy. It is still flooding the world with excess goods. It is still shoveling cheap credit into its shipbuilding industry, adding to the glut. It is still keeping its solar industry on life-support. China remains chronically reliant on global markets. Given that its trade surplus is rising again, it is questionable whether China is adding any net demand to the world. The eurozone, Britain and an ever widening circle of countries in Eastern Europe and the Balkans are mired in recession. Growth is expected to be just 2pc in Russia and 3pc in Brazil this year. My fear - hopefully wrong - is that recovery will falter over the second half, leaving the developed world trapped in a quasi-slump, a sort of grey zone of zero growth that goes on and on, with debt trajectories ratcheting up. The Dallas Fed's PCE index of core inflation has already dropped to 1.1pc over the past six months. The eurozone's core gauge has fallen to 1.5pc. A dozen EMU countries already have one foot in deflation with flat or contracting nominal GDP. Another shock will tip them over the edge into a deflationary slide. If Lord Turner's helicopters are ever needed, we can be sure that the Anglo-Saxons and the Japanese will steal a march, while Europe will be the last to move. The European Central Bank will resist monetary financing of deficits until the bitter end, knowing that such action risks destroying German political consent for the euro project. By holding the line on orthodoxy, the ECB will guarantee that Euroland continues to suffer the deepest depression. Once the dirty game begins, you stand aside at your peril. A great many readers in Britain and the US will be horrified that this helicopter debate is taking place at all, as if the QE virus is mutating into ever more deadly strains. Bondholders across the world may suspect that Britain, the US and other deadbeat states are engineering a stealth default on sovereign debts, and they may be right in a sense. But they are warned. This is the next shoe to drop in the temples of central banking. |
04-11-13 | GLOBAL MONETARY | CENTRAL BANKS |
CENTRAL BANK BALANCE SHEET EXPANSION - Theoretical Path to SPX of 1950 Bernanke & Kuroda Capital LLC: Overweight S&P 500, 2013 Target 1950 04-10-13 Zero Hedge Given that the Fed and the BoJ has our back (and will add a further $1.75tn or so to their balance sheets by 2013 year-end), we should expect US equity prices to rise to infinity and beyond. As one smart chap on the television noted, "stocks won't go down again," but given expectations for earnings in 2013 (which include the remarkable hockey-stick in Q4 - which surely would only occur if things were strong enough to warrant the Fed pulling back in a reflexive vicious circle), the S&P 500 will trade at a rather expensive 19.5x P/E at end-2013 (which we are sure we will be told is still cheap). but the Europeans are seeing LTRO-payback reducing the size of their balance sheet and the Chinese are 'anxious' so factoring in the BoJ riding to the rescue as well, it seems a much more conservative 1900 target for S&P 500 is warranted by year-end... The question is - at what point is an equity market multiple representative of exuberance and what if the correlation breaks - what if the herd realizes that none of it is wealth until you take profits. And with that kind of 'wealth' creation, will inflation pop up its ugly head? Given correlations, Gold would trade at $2200 by year-end (and WTI Oil over $140)... Charts: Bloomberg |
GLOBAL MONETARY | CENTRAL BANKS |
|
Market Analytics | |||
TECHNICALS & MARKET ANALYTICS |
|
||
SEARCH FOR YIELD - Treasury-Corporate Spread Bigger than S&P Yield Moody’s Corporate AAA bond yields vs US 10yr Constant Maturity Yield to 1857 04-10-13 Ritholtz There is a tendency to look at the S&P500 Dividend Yields vs US 10 year, but in many ways, that is a less than ideal comparison. Corporate Bonds are more of an apple to apple comparison. Note that there is an almost 200 bps spread over the US 10yr — nearly double the dividend yield of the S&P500. We keep talking about how the “Great Rotation” into equities from bonds has not yet happened, but folks looking for yield may wish to pay more attention to AAA rated corporates. Dow Hits Record Amid ‘Absence of Attractive Alternatives’ to Equities 04-09-13 WSJ
|
04-11-13 | DRIVERS YIELD |
ANALYTICS |
PATTERNS - Consumer Discretionary Showing Real Strength Why is S&P500 Consumer Discretionary Hitting Highs? 04-09-13 AlphaNOW Here is another one of those things I find perplexing: I keep hearing that healthcare, utilities and consumer staples are doing well — and that this rotation is usually caused by fear of an economic slowdown. But what if its something else? Might healthcare be part of a secular move caused by the aging of the baby boomers? Utilities and Staples both have high dividends — might these be an alternative to 10 year Treasuries yielding 1.73 today? To those people expecting a recession, how can we explain the Consumer Discretionary sector hitting highs? I don’t have the answers, but my curiosity leads me to these questions. And the chart above, via MER — showing that Consumer Discretionary sector is in a “secular bull market on both an absolute and relative price basis. The big breakouts from early 2012 remain intact and the sector achieved new all-time absolute and relative price highs yesterday.” Merrill notes that “this is a bullish back-drop for the sector and for the US equity market longer-term.” |
04-10-13 | PATTERNS | ANALYTICS |
FUNDAMENTALS - Hussman: Earnings Excessive by Historical Norms U.S. Stock Market Is ‘Overvalued, Overbought and Overbullish’: John Hussman 04-10-13 The Daily Ticker We enter earnings season with the Dow and S&P 500 having recently passed their all-time highs. One of the narratives for why the markets keep rising
Meanwhile, there are warnings coming from some commentators of a bubble in stocks or a bubble in bonds, or a bubble in certain areas of the credit market. Fund manager John Hussman wrote in a recent weekly market commentary, "the real hook, in my view, is the absence of a bubble in any individual sector, and instead a bubble in profit margins across the entire corporate sector Related: Wall Street Tells Washington: Cut Corporate Taxes in 2013 According to Hussman,
So what’s the catalyst that will drive corporate profits over the cliff? "Even marginal improvements in the federal deficit and in household savings, which are necessary because of the debt burdens households have taken on…we are likely to see -12% earnings growth annualized over the next three to four years - in other words substantial weakness in corporate profits," Hussman tells The Daily Ticker. We sat down with him at the 2013 Wine Country Conference benefiting the Les Turner ALS Foundation Related: A “Ludicrous” Tax System Leaves Billions of U.S. Corporate Profits Overseas Here’s Hussman’s rationale. He says the deficit of one sector has to emerge as the surplus of another sector. Record deficits for households and the government combined have to show up as a surplus somewhere. Hussman argues that we see a mirror image of record deficits for households and the government, and record surpluses at the corporate level as a fraction of GDP. Hussman describes the current stock market as “overvalued, overbought, and overbullish" -- an environment where stocks can creep higher but crash for no good reason. Related: Earnings Growth Has Peaked But Stocks Can Still Do Well: Liz Ann Sonders That said, it’s been a tough last year for some Hussman funds. For example, the Strategic Growth Fund is down more than eight percent over the past 12 months. “A good portion of that is on the stock selection side, where we are in somewhat more defensive stocks,” Hussman tells us in the accompanying interview. “We are not in homebuilders, financials, materials, cyclicals.” Hussman believes QE has encouraged speculation on these “new economies.” He says rounds of QE over the last few years have only served to kick the can down the road. He doesn’t see the QE impact as any more than a short-term can-kick, but notes it’s been a problem for Hussman Funds. He sees the benefit from QE being less and less over time. Hussman also adds that his funds are meant for investing long term while managing risk. (Hussman is president and principal shareholder of Hussman Strategic Advisors, the investment advisory firm that manages the Hussman Funds.) He points to past periods, like in 2000, when he was not celebrated because he was negative on tech stocks. We all know how well tech stocks worked out. “In our world is what we sometimes call the champ-to-chump cycle,” he says. “Over the full cycle, people who care about risk will go through that fluctuation.” |
ANALYTICS |
||
VALUATIONS - CAPE and TOBIN Suggest 50 Percent Overvalued Markets This Chart Should Scare The Bejeezus Out Of Stock Investors 04-04-13 BI Now that the stock market is hitting new highs, everyone's suddenly excited about buying stocks again. Meanwhile, four years ago, when stocks were at a decade low, no one wanted to have anything to do with them. It is ever thus. Warren Buffett is fond of observing that, when any other item in the economy goes on sale, folks get stoked about buying it. ("It's cheap! I'm getting a deal!") When stocks go on sale, meanwhile, folks are appalled by the idea of buying them. Instead, everyone wants to wait until stocks have gone up steadily for many years and, therefore, seem "safe." The good news about this bizarre and return-destroying attitude is that it creates an opportunity for investors who can manage their own emotions and buy when others are fearful, as they were four years ago, and sell (or at least get cautious) when others are greedy. And right now, after four years of amazing gains in stocks, investors are getting greedy. Does this mean the market is about to crash? No. Nothing means that the market is about to crash. Crashes are just a risk that you have to accept if you want to invest in the stock market. And for long-term investors, these crashes aren't actually a big or bad deal. They create the opportunity to invest more money in stocks at lower prices. But investors who are now feeling comfortable with the stock market because stocks just keep going up should keep a couple of things in mind. First, when measured on valid valuation measures--measures that take into account the business cycle and have shown an ability to predict future returns--stocks are very expensive. As fund manager John Hussman notes this week, two of these measures--
Suggest that stocks are about 50% overvalued. Hussman includes the following chart, which is from the excellent strategist Andrew Smithers in London. See how high stock valuations are relative to most of the last century? Again, this overvaluation does not mean that stocks are about to crash. But it does suggest that future returns are likely to be very low relative to long-term averages. John Hussman estimates that stocks will only return about 3.5% per year over the next decade, which is a far cry from the 10% long-term average and the even greater returns of the past few years. So, even barring a crash, investors should keep their long-term return expectations in check. One thing that might actually cause stocks to crash, meanwhile, is a return of corporate profit margins to their long-term averages. Those who say today's stock market is "cheap" are comparing today's price to this year's earnings. The problem is that this year's earnings are benefitting from record-high profit margins. American companies have never made as much money per dollar of revenue as they are making now. And, in the past, when profit margins have spiked to levels that are even approaching today's levels, the margins have suddenly and violently reverted to the mean. Importantly:
At some point, today's record-high profit margins will almost certainly revert to the mean. If this happens suddenly, the way it has always happens in the past, the stock market will almost certainly crash. Now, there are many good reasons for long-term investors to keep a healthy percentage of their portfolios in stocks:
But investors who aren't really long-term investors--and who are, instead, buying stocks because they're finally comfortable that stocks aren't risky anymore--should find this chart very unnerving. |
04-09-13 | STUDY VALUATIONS |
ANALYTICS |
EARNINGS - Expect Contraction in earnings over the next 4 years at a rate of roughly 12% annually. HUSSMAN: Wake Up, People — The Economy's Lousy And Earnings Are Going To Tank 04-08-13 John Hussman via BI Fund manager John Hussman of the Hussman Funds sounds the alarm again in his most recent weekly note. Specifically, he suggests that the economy is much weaker than most people realize and may, in fact, be in a recession. And then he observes that corporate earnings, which have driven the stock market to a record high (without adjusting for inflation) are based on record-high profit margins that will almost certainly drop. First, here's Hussman on the economy: While there is no shortage of smug observers who believe that recession risk does not exist and never did, the fact is that the strongest leading indicators, as well as the most timely coincident data, have deteriorated and danced along the border between economic expansion and economic recession for more than two years. Meanwhile, repeated rounds of QE have produced little but short-lived bounces to defer a recession that historically would have followed such deterioration more quickly. The chart below offers a good picture of this process. Notice the successively lower levels, as each round of quantitative easing has smaller and smaller effects on real economic activity (speculative activity in the financial markets aside). The question at present is whether the recent bounce will prove to be temporary as well. This expectation is certainly consistent with the series of rapid-fire misses from the Chicago Purchasing Managers Index (particularly the new orders component), the national PMI reports for both manufacturing and services, and the unexpected weakness on both payroll and household employment surveys. For my part, I continue to expect the U.S. economy to join a global recession that is already in progress in much of the developed world (assuming a U.S. recession has not already started, which we can’t rule out, but would require knowledge of eventual data revisions to confirm). Suffice it to say that the realistic case for a sustained economic expansion here remains terribly thin. And then there are corporate earnings. As we've noted frequently, they are based on record-high profit margins, and profit margins have a very strong tendency to suddenly and violently revert to means. Yes, corporate profits are benefitting from a major contribution from international profits, and this could end up muting the mean-reversion (by raising the "mean"). But U.S. corporations have been generating international profits for many decades, and this has not changed the profit-margin mean reversion that we see in Hussman's chart. Here's Hussman: On the earnings front, my concern continues to be that investors don’t seem to recognize that profit margins are more than 70% above their historical norms, nor the extent to which this surplus is the direct result of a historic (and unsustainable) deficit in the sum of government and household savings (see Two Myths and A Legend for an analysis, including more than a half-century of data on this). As a result, investors seem oblivious to the likelihood of earnings disappointments not only in coming quarters, but in the next several years. We continue to expect this disappointment to amount to a contraction in earnings over the next 4 years at a rate of roughly 12% annually. "... A contraction in earnings over the next 4 years at a rate of roughly 12% annually." Imagine what will happen to stock prices if Hussman is even half right. |
04-09-13 | RISK | ANALYTICS |
HFT AVOIDANCE - Dark Pools Now 40%, InternaLiization 60% Of Off-Exchange Trading As Market Heats Up, Trading Slips Into Shadows 03-31-13 New York Times As the stock market continues to climb, trading has increasingly migrated from established bourses like the New York Stock Exchange to private platforms, including dark pools, that are largely hidden from public view. The shift is helping big traders hide what they are doing in the markets, and regulators are worried that the development could obscure the true prices of stocks and scare away ordinary investors. The movement, under way for several years, has gathered force recently. The portion of all stock trading taking place away from the public exchanges hit new highs over the last few weeks, amounting to close to 40 percent on several days, up from an average of 16 percent in 2008, according to Rosenblatt Securities. The trend has bucked the government’s broad effort in recent years to move more of the financial industry out of the back rooms and into the light. The increasing opacity of stock trading in the United States, long the most transparent place in the financial world, is troubling for investors and regulators. “We’ve been having a lot of discussions about whether we are reaching a tipping point between lit and unlit markets,” said Thomas Gira, head of market regulation at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the industry-financed regulator. In March, Australia introduced new rules to limit trading off-exchange, following the lead of Canada, which put regulations in place last fall. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission has so far declined to act. The concerns are also evident in the industry itself, where a few dark pools have recently been advertising tools that promise to keep out “gaming” and “toxic” trading practices going on in other dark pools. Dark pools, like public exchanges, give investors a place to connect with buyers and sellers of stock, but the pools are subject to less stringent regulations than public exchanges. Often run by big banks, dark pools do not require buyers and sellers to publicly announce their intention to trade stocks, allowing traders and investors to hide behind a veil that only the operator of the pool can penetrate. That appeals to a pension fund that wants to buy a million shares of Ford stock, for instance, because it allows the fund to avoid tipping off competitors who could push the price of the stock up. Investors also have said that they have moved more of their trading into the dark because they have grown more distrustful of the big exchanges like the N.Y.S.E. and the Nasdaq. Those exchanges have been hit by technological mishaps and become dominated by so-called high-frequency traders. But the biggest factor pushing trading away from the public exchanges is the ongoing decline in volatility in stock prices, traders say. When share prices are rising or falling sharply, investors want to quickly and reliably get their trade done, leading to a preference for the safety of an exchange. In calmer trading, on the other hand, the anonymity of dark pools is more attractive. What’s more, dark pools are generally cheaper to use than an exchange. Other places besides the 30-plus dark pools are stealing the business of stock exchanges. A handful of firms including Citigroup and Knight Capital pay retail brokers like TD Ameritrade and Scottrade for the opportunity to trade with ordinary retail investors before the orders can reach an exchange, a phenomenon known as internalization. This type of off-exchange trading has also been growing, in part because of the recent revival of interest in the stock market among ordinary investors. In recent weeks, internalization has accounted for about 60 percent of off-exchange trading and dark pools for about 40 percent. The complicated structure of the stock markets makes it hard to get reliable numbers on the exact amount of trading going on in the different entities. Some operators of dark pools say that the most widely used numbers misrepresent the amount of trading going on in the dark, and ignore the fact that on public exchanges some types of trading happen out of the public eye. Dan Mathisson, the operator of the nation’s largest dark pool, Credit Suisse’s CrossFinder, said that American regulators should not introduce new rules just because of the fears surrounding dark pools. Mr. Mathisson also said that dark pools have not had the technology problems that have done real harm to investors. Trading in the dark is just one of the facets of the turbocharged stock market that lawmakers have been examining. High-frequency trading has often grabbed the public spotlight. But while high-speed traders have been dialing back their activity, trading in the dark has kept rising. Canada has been among the most aggressive countries in confronting dark trading, introducing rules last fall that allow trades to take place in dark pools only if brokers are getting customers a significantly better price than is available on the public exchange. Within months, dark pool trading in Canada dropped to about a third of what it was before the rule, according to Rosenblatt Securities. Regulators and long-term investors fear that the movement away from exchanges will diminish part of what has made the American stock market the envy of the world: the public auction process. In off-exchange trading, investors cannot see what trades are available and as a result are not encouraged to offer a better price. A recent study by researchers in Australia found that the cost of trading went up for all traders when more trading happened in the dark, backing up an earlier study by an economist at Rutgers, Daniel Weaver. “If long-term investors are being siphoned off and sent away from the exchanges, there will be less competition and prices will get worse,” said Mr. Weaver. Because most dark pools and internalizers are operated by banks, Finra, the industry-financed regulator, is also worried that the banks can provide a sneak peek of the trading their customers are doing to their own traders and selected customers. Last September, Finra began gathering information from 15 of the largest dark pools and is now trying to determine whether the banks have improperly shared information about the customers in their dark pools. “We’ve seen some problematic activity when we’ve looked at” dark pools in trading exams, said Mr. Gira, Finra’s head of market regulation. Among long-term investors, 67 percent said that they have “trust issues” with dark pools, according to a survey last year by the Tabb Group. Kevin Cronin, the top trader at the mutual fund provider Invesco, said that to buy and sell stocks in his firm’s mutual funds he has to dedicate an increasing amount of time and money navigating the dark pools. There is too much trading going on there to avoid it, he said. Last month, Invesco hired a top trader from Mr. Mathisson’s company, Credit Suisse, to keep up with the latest technological developments. But Mr. Cronin said that he worries as he and other traders escalate the amount of business they are doing out of the public eye. “It’s just not an efficient market if a fair amount of orders never see the light of day,” he said. “We should all be concerned about this.”
|
04-09-13 | RISK | ANALYTICS |
COMMODITY CORNER - HARD ASSETS | |||
THESIS Themes | |||
2013 - STATISM |
|||
2012 - FINANCIAL REPRESSION |
|||
2011 - BEGGAR-THY-NEIGHBOR -- CURRENCY WARS |
|||
CHINA FURIOUS - Calls It Japanese Monetary Blackmail "Livid" Top Chinese Economists Call BOJ Decision "Monetary Blackmail", Demand "Currency War" Retaliation 04-08-13- Zero Hedge The Chinese Central Bank has so far stoically endured the monthly injection of $85 billion in boiling hot money for the past seven months, lovingly delivered by the inhabitants of the Marriner Eccles building, even if it meant a proportionate hawkish response which has pushed the Shanghai Composite red for the year, and having to deal with a property market that is on the verge of another inflationary blow off top. But while the PBOC will grudgingly take this kind of monetary abuse from Bernanke, now that it has to deal with another de novo created $70+ billion in monthly central bank liquidity (poetically called Carry-O-QE by Deutsche's Jim Reid), this time coming from that loathed neighbor and one time invader across the East China Sea, China won't take it any more. As the SCMP reports, "Many of China's top economists are livid at what they view as an effective currency devaluation by Japan and are calling on the People's Bank of China to retaliate by weakening the yuan to defend itself in what they see as a new currency war." Of course, calling on the PBOC to "do something about it" is one thing, and certainly China whose GDP is still extremely reliant on net exports for economic growth would like nothing more than to crush the CNY, boost its exports and hurt Japan in the process. However, if it does that, it will merely accelerate already rampant home price inflation, which in the aftermath of the recent chicken culling birdflu outbreak and what is already a scracity of pork meat after last year's corn drought, will then spread to food prices and lead to mass social instability (something Japan, and its docile, irradiated population apparently has little to worry about). More from South China Morning Post:
All spot on, and all well-known in advance, but apparently all the brilliant minds in the world forget that trade is a zero-sum game, and that Japan's current account and trade surplus gain (if any, recall both hit record lows recently) facilitated by a plunging yen, will come at the expense of other very angry exporting nations. This also ignores what happens to Japanese import energy and food prices, already exploding as has been documented here previously. The BOJ's hope: companies will promptly hike wages to make up for rising staples costs. We hope the central banker often confused with a Yankees pitcher is not holding his breath on that one... As for countries hating Japan's guts right now, China may have to wait in line: if there is one country that has to be truly livid at Japan it is South Korea, whose net exports account for nearly 60% of its GDP. So yes: the next currency war salvo will come most likely not from China, which is already caught between a rock and a hard place, but from Seoul, where the perfect storm of a totally nutjob neighbor to the north has emerged just in time for Japan to do everything in its power to crush its economy. In conclusion, if there is one thing Japan has done, is to make sure all the overnight angst so carefully focused on Europe in 2011 and 2012 (and where it is pretty much game over now following news that "success-story" Portugal will pay public workers in bonds not in cash, all it takes is someone to put down the time of death) shift forward, with the attention now focused not on the 3 am European open, but on what promises to be a daily 8 pm Eastern JGB volatity explosion each and every day. |
04-08-13 | THESIS CHINA |
|
2010 - EXTEN D & PRETEND |
|||
THEMES | |||
CORPORATOCRACY - CRONY CAPITALSIM | |||
GLOBAL FINANCIAL IMBALANCE | |||
SOCIAL UNREST |
|||
CENTRAL PLANNING |
|||
STANDARD OF LIVING |
|||
NATURE OF WORK | |||
CATALYSTS - FEAR & GREED | |||
GENERAL INTEREST |
|
||
TO TOP | |||
|
Tipping Points Life Cycle - Explained
Click on image to enlarge
TO TOP
![]() |
YOUR SOURCE FOR THE LATEST THINKING & RESEARCH
|
TO TOP
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. DISCLOSURE Gordon T Long is not a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. Of course, he recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments. COPYRIGHT © Copyright 2010-2011 Gordon T Long. The information herein was obtained from sources which Mr. Long believes reliable, but he does not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that Mr. Long may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website. Mr. Long does not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security. You should consider this possibility before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you receive from him
|