Scroll TWEETS for LATEST Analysis
Read More - OUR RESEARCH - Articles Below
HOTTEST TIPPING POINTS |
|
|
Theme Groupings |
|

Investing in Macro Tipping Points
QUARTERLY SMII "CALLS" |
EXPECTED MACRO DEVELOPMENT |
INVESTMENT STRATEGY |
INSIGHT |
|
|
|
COMPLETED |
Q1 2014 |
UKRAINE & the PETRO$$ |
Global Shift in LNG Balance |
Vehicle: Gazprom (OGZPY)
Click Chart
|
Q2 2014 |
|
Collapse in Select REITs |
Vehicle: S&P Discretionary Spending SPDR (XLY)

Click Chart |
COMPLETED |
|
|
COMPLETED |
Q3 2014 |
|
Slowing Central Bank Liquidity |
Short Equities (Nasdaq / Russell 2000) ONLY with Death Cross Confirmations

|
COMPLETED |
|
|
COMPLETED |
Q3 2014 |
|
ECB T-LTRO Impact |
Short EURUSD Cross

|
2H 2014 |
|
"ABENOMICS" - A FLAWED POLICY |
YEN WEAKNESS (in US$ - Inverted)

|
|
|
|
|
2H 2014 |
GLOBAL EVENT RISKS
US$ 'CARRY' COVERING (Short Squeeze)
|
FLIGHT TO 'PERCEIVED' SAFETY |
US$ STRENGTH

|
|
|
|
|
2H 2014 |
GLOBAL EVENT RISKS
GEO-POLITICAL
GEO-ECONOMIC
|
CONFLICT WIOTH RUSSIA |
CRUDE WEAKENESS

|
THESE ARE NOT RECOMMENDATIONS - THEY ARE MACRO COMMENTARY ONLY - Investments of any kind involve risk. Please read our complete risk disclaimer and terms of use below by clicking HERE |
We post throughout the day as we do our Investment Research for:
LONGWave - UnderTheLens - Macro Analytics |
"BEST OF THE WEEK "
|
Posting Date |
Labels & Tags |
TIPPING POINT
or
THEME / THESIS
or
INVESTMENT INSIGHT
|

MOST CRITICAL TIPPING POINT ARTICLES TODAY |
|
|
|
DRIVER$ - USD & Energy

USD

The $9 TRILLION Crash Gains & Pains
The financial world focuses far too much on stocks. The stock market, despite being at record highs (meaning record market capitalizations) remains one of the smallest, and least sophisticated markets on the planet. Consider that stocks, even at current lofty levels, have a global market capitalization of slightly over $60 trillion.
In contrast, the global bond market is well over $100 trillion. And the global currency market trades OVER $5.3 trillion per day.
It is currencies, not stocks, where the most significant moves occur. The currency markets are the largest, most liquid markets in the world. They are always first to move when things change. Stocks are the DUMB money compared to currencies.
So who cares?
Everyone should care, because, globally, the world is awash in borrowed money… most of it in US Dollars.
When you BORROW in US Dollars you are effectively SHORTING the US Dollar. So when the US Dollar rallies… you have to cover your SHORT or you blow up.
I’ve written before about this problem. Last month I projected that the US Dollar carry trade (borrowing in US Dollars to finance other investments) was the largest carry trade in the world. At that time I believed the US Dollar carry trade is believed to be north of $3 trillion.
I was WRONG… WAY, WAY WRONG. It’s MANY MULTIPLES LARGER THAN THAT.
Off-shore lending in US dollars has soared to $9 trillion and poses a growing risk to both emerging markets and the world's financial stability, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.
SOURCE: the TELEGRAPH.
The US Dollar carry trade is north of $9 trillion… literally than the economies of Germany and Japan COMBINED.
And the US Dollar is rallying… HARD.

The fact that Oil is imploding at the same time this happens is not coincidence. Oil producers and explorers were financing their projects using what? BORROWED DOLLARS.
This is going to begin seeping into emerging markets and other assets soon. Imagine what the world would look like if $9 trillion worth of shorted Dollars had to be covered? Imagine the SELL PRESSURE this would induce in all other assets.
Just like 2008.
OIL - WTI

10 Reasons Why A Severe Drop in Oil Prices Is A Problem
12-08-14 Gail Tverberg via Our Finite World blog,
QE allows more borrowing from the future than would be possible if market interest rates really had to be paid. This allows financiers to temporarily disguise a growing problem of un-affordability of oil and other commodities.
The problem we have is that, because we live in a finite world, we reach a point where it becomes more expensive to produce commodities of many kinds: oil (deeper wells, fracking), coal (farther from markets, so more transport costs), metals (poorer ore quality), fresh water (desalination needed), and food (more irrigation needed). Wages don’t rise correspondingly, because more and more labor is needed to provide less and less actual benefit, in terms of the commodities produced and goods made from those commodities. Thus, workers find themselves becoming poorer and poorer, in terms of what they can afford to purchase.
QE allows financiers to disguise growing mismatch between what it costs to produce commodities, and what customers can really afford. Thus, QE allows commodity prices to rise to levels that are unaffordable by customers, unless customers’ lack of income is disguised by a continued growth in debt.
Once commodity prices (including oil prices) fall to levels that are affordable based on the incomes of customers, they fall to levels that cut out a large share of production of these commodities. As commodity production drops to levels that can be produced at affordable prices, so does the world’s ability to make goods and services. Unfortunately, the goods whose production is likely to be cut back if commodity production is cut back are those of every kind, including houses, cars, food, and electrical transmission equipment.
Conclusion
There are really two different problems that a person can be concerned about:
- Peak oil: the possibility that oil prices will rise, and because of this production will fall in a rounded curve. Substitutes that are possible because of high prices will perhaps take over.
- Debt related collapse: oil limits will play out in a very different way than most have imagined, through lower oil prices as limits to growth in debt are reached, and thus a collapse in oil “demand” (reallyaffordability). The collapse in production, when it comes, will be sharper and will affect the entire economy, not just oil.
In my view, a rapid drop in oil prices is likely a symptom that we are approaching a debt-related collapse - in other words, the second of these two problems. Underlying this debt-related collapse is the fact that we seem to be reaching the limits of a finite world. There is a growing mismatch between what workers in oil importing countries can afford, and the rising real costs of extraction, including associated governmental costs. This has been covered up to date by rising debt, but at some point, it will not be possible to keep increasing the debt sufficiently.
The timing of collapse may not be immediate. Low oil prices take a while to work their way through the system. It is also possible that the world’s financiers will put off a major collapse for a while longer, through more QE, or more programs related to QE. For example, actually getting money into the hands of customers would seem to be temporarily helpful.
At some point the debt situation will eventually reach a breaking point. One way this could happen is through an increase in interest rates. If this happens, world economic growth is likely to slow greatly. Oil and commodity prices will fall further. Debt defaults will skyrocket. Not only will oil production drop, but production of many other commodities will drop, including natural gas and coal. In such a scenario, the downslope of all energy use is likely to be quite steep, perhaps similar to what is shown in the following chart.
Figure 5. Estimate of future energy production by author. Historical data based on BP adjusted to IEA groupings.
Related Articles:
Low Oil Prices: Sign of a Debt Bubble Collapse, Leading to the End of Oil Supply?
WSJ Gets it Wrong on “Why Peak Oil Predictions Haven’t Come True”
Eight Pieces of Our Oil Price Predicament |
12-09-14 |
DRIVERS |
|
DRIVER$ - Sudden market swings, dollar rise expose emerging market vulnerability: BIS
Sudden market swings, dollar rise expose emerging market vulnerability: BIS
12-07-14 Reuters

Traffic flows in front of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel December 5, 2013. Credit: Reuters/Arnd Wiegmann
(Reuters) - Sudden swings in financial markets recently suggest they are becoming more fragile and sensitive to unexpected events, the global organization of central banks said on Sunday, warning that a rising U.S. dollar could have a "profound impact" on emerging markets in particular.
MSCI's all-country world stock index is hovering around multi-year highs after rebounding from sell-offs in August and October.
The downturns were triggered by uncertainty over the global economic outlook and monetary policy, as well as geopolitical tensions, and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said the sharp and sudden dips pointed to frailty in the markets.
"These abrupt market movements (in October) were even more pronounced than similar developments in August, when a sudden correction in global financial markets was quickly succeeded by renewed buoyant market conditions," the BIS said.
"This suggests that more than a quantum of fragility underlies the current elevated mood in financial markets," it said in its quarterly review. "Global equity markets plummeted in early August and mid-October. Mid-October's extreme intra-day price movements underscore how sensitive markets have become to even small surprises."
The comments followed the organization's warning in September that financial asset prices were at "elevated" levels and market volatility remained "exceptionally subdued" thanks to ultra-loose monetary policies being implemented by central banks around the world.
Since then, the U.S. Federal Reserve has brought its monthly bond-purchase program to an expected end. However, Japan's central bank has expanded its massive stimulus spending while China unexpectedly cut interest rates, adding to stimulus measures from the European Central Bank.
These divergent monetary policies [US' TAPER ending and Japan's Massive new stimulus], coupled with the dollar's recent appreciation, could have a profound impact on the global economy, particularly in emerging markets where many companies have large dollar-denominated liabilities, the BIS said.
"It's the warning that the rising dollar could bring more (emerging markets) trouble in its wake - as it did in the 1990s - that is going to challenge FX markets tomorrow morning while we're all thinking about what the U.S. non-farm payroll data mean for Fed rate hike timing," Societe Generale's currency strategist Kit Juckes told clients in a note on Sunday.
Juckes was referring to the larger-than-expected 321,000 rise in U.S. jobs in November reported on Friday, data which sent the dollar to multi-year highs against the yen and euro.
Separately, the BIS report said that international banking activity expanded for the second quarter running between end-March and end-June.
Cross-border claims of BIS reporting banks rose by $401 billion. The annual growth rate of cross-border claims rose to 1.2 percent in the year to end-June, the first move into positive territory since late 2011.
(Editing by Pravin Char and Rosalind Russell)
FT HEADLINE 12-09-14
|
12-09-14 |
DRIVERS |
|
DRIVER$ -Dollar surge endangers global debt edifice, warns BIS
Dollar surge endangers global debt edifice, warns BIS 12-07-14 Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, FT
Bank for International Settlements concerned about underlying health of world economy as dollar loans to emerging markets increase rapidly

BIS warned that dollar loans to Chinese banks and companies are rising at annual rate of 47pc and now stand at $1.1 trillion Photo: Oliver Yao / Alamy
Off-shore lending in US dollars has soared to $9 trillion and poses a growing risk to both emerging markets and the world's financial stability, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.
The Swiss-based global watchdog said dollar loans to Chinese banks and companies are rising at annual rate of 47pc. They have jumped to $1.1 trillion from almost nothing five years ago.
Cross-border dollar credit has ballooned to
- BRAZIL: $456bn in Brazil,
- MEXICO: $381bn in Mexico.
- RUSSIA: External debt has reached $715bn in Russia, mostly in dollars.
A chunk of China's borrowing is disguised as intra-firm financing. This replicates practices by German industrial companies in the 1920s, which hid their real level of exposure as the 1929 debt trauma was building up.
"To the extent that these flows are driven by financial operations rather than real activities, they could give rise to financial stability concerns," said the BIS in its quarterly report.
"More than a quantum of fragility underlies the current elevated mood in financial markets," it warned. Officials are disturbed by the "risk-on, risk-off, flip-flopping" by investors. Some of the violent moves lately go beyond stress seen in earlier crises, a sign that markets may be dangerously stretched and that many fund managers do not really believe their own Goldilocks narrative.
"Mid-October’s extreme intraday price movements underscore how sensitive markets have become to even small surprises. On 15 October, the yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell almost 37 basis points, more than the drop on 15 September 2021 when Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy."
"These fluctuations were large relative to actual economic and policy surprises, as the only notable negative piece of news that day was the release of somewhat weaker than expected retail sales data for the US one hour before the event," it said.
The BIS said 55pc of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) now being issued are based on leveraged loans, an "unprecedented level".
This raises eyebrows because CDOs were pivotal in the 2008 crash. "Activity in the leveraged loan markets even surpassed the levels recorded before the crisis: average quarterly announcements during the year to end-September 2014 were $250bn," it said.
BIS officials are worried that tightening by the US Federal Reserve will transmit a credit shock through East Asia and the emerging world, both by raising the cost of borrowing and by pushing up the dollar.
"The appreciation of the dollar against the backdrop of divergent monetary policies may, if persistent, have a profound impact on the global economy. A continued depreciation of the domestic currency against the dollar could reduce the creditworthiness of many firms, potentially inducing a tightening of financial conditions," it said.
The dollar index (DXY) has surged 12pc since late June to 89.36, smashing through its 30-year downtrend line. The currency has risen 55pc against the Russian rouble and 18pc against Brazil's real over the same period.
Hyun Song Shin, the BIS's head of research, said the world's central banks still hold over 60pc of their reserves in dollars. This ratio has changed remarkably little in forty years, but the overall level has soared -- from $1 trillion to $12 trillion just since 2000.

Cross-border lending in dollars has tripled to $9 trillion in a decade. Some $7 trillion of this is entirely outside the American regulatory sphere.
"Neither a borrower nor a lender is a US resident. The role that the US dollar plays in debt contracts is very important. It is a global currency, and no other currency has this role," he said.
The implication is that there is no lender-of-last resort standing behind trillions of off-shore dollar bank transactions. This increases the risks of a chain-reaction if it ever goes wrong.
China's central bank has ample dollar reserves to bail out its companies - should it wish to do so - but the jury is out on Brazil, Russia, and other countries.
This flaw in the global system may be tested as the Fed prepares to raise interest rates for the first time in seven years. The US economy is growing at a blistering pace of 3.9pc. Non-farm payrolls surged by 321,000 in November and wage growth is at last picking up.
Two years ago the Fed expected unemployment to be 7.4pc at this stage. In fact it is 5.8pc. The Fed's new “optimal control” model suggest that raise rates may rise sooner and faster than markets expect. This has the makings of a global shock.
The great unknown is whether the current cycle of Fed tightening will lead to the same sort of stress seen in the Latin American debt crisis in the early 1980s or the East Asia/Russia crisis in the late 1990s.
This time governments have far less dollar debt, but corporate dollar debt has replaced it, with mounting excesses in the non-bank bond markets. Emerging market bond issuance in dollars has jumped by $550bn since 2009. "This trend could have important financial stability implications," it said.
BIS officials are concerned that the risks may be just as great in this episode, though the weak links may not be where we think they are. Just as generals fight the last war, regulators have be fretting chiefly about bank leverage since the Lehman crisis.
Yet the new threat may lie in non-leveraged investments by asset managers and pension funds funnelling vast sums of excess capital around the world, especially into emerging markets.
- Many of these are so-called "macro-tourists" chasing yield, in some cases with little grasp of global geopolitics.
- Studies suggest that they have a low tolerance for losses.
- They engage in clustering and crowd behaviours, and
- Are apt to pull-out en masse, risking a bad feedback-loop.
This could prove to be today's systemic danger. "If we rely too much on the familiar mechanisms, we may be missing the new vulnerabilities building up," said Mr Shin in a speech to the Brookings Institution last week.

The BIS has particular authority since its job is to track global lending. It was the only major body to warn of serious trouble before the Great Recession - and did so clearly, without the usual ifs and buts.
It now warns that the world is in many ways even more stretched today than it was in 2008, since emerging markets have been drawn into the global debt morass as well, and some have hit the limits of easy catch-up growth.
Debt levels in rich countries have jumped by 30 percentage points since the Lehman crisis to 275pc of GDP, and by the same amount to 175pc in emerging markets. The world has exhausted almost all of its buffer
WE WARNED OF THE US$ CARRY BOOMERANG IN 2013

|
12-09-14 |
DRIVERS |
|
PATTERNS - Markets Steadily Breaking Down
Not only materials & mining sectors but also now dividend-paying, REIT & financial sectors are turning lower on the financial markets.
Energy investors have found themselves in a nightmare the past few months (black arrow below). It is the same nightmare that materials and mining investors (green, blue and brown arrows) have been living through since 2011 as:
- Global demand turned down,
- Excess supply piled up and
- Earnings evaporated.
Now the same nightmare is stalking the last late cycle sectors left hovering at hideous valuations:
- Dividend paying (purple),
- REITs (orange) and
- Financials (red lines shown below).
As these sectors also finally give up on the dream that QE could prop up a sagging economy, the 2009 lows beckon prices, and the broad market TSX (grey line,) back to reality.
|
12-09-14 |
PATTERNS |
ANALYTICS |
MOST CRITICAL TIPPING POINT ARTICLES THIS WEEK - Nov. 30th - Dec 6th, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THESIS |
2012 - FINANCIAL REPRESSION |
2012
2013
2014 |
|
|
FINANCIAL REPRESSION - Wall Street Moves to Put Taxpayers on the Hook for Derivatives Trades

They would allow financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. — potentially putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by the risky contracts. Big Wall Street banks had typically traded derivatives from these FDIC-backed units, but the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law required them to move many of the transactions to other subsidiaries that are not insured by taxpayers.

Wall Street Moves to Put Taxpayers on the Hook for Derivatives Trades 12-05-14 Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg
Wall Street has for some time attempted to put taxpayers on the hook for its derivatives trades.
READ: Citigroup Written Legislation Moves Through the House of Representatives. Here’s an excerpt:
Five years after the Wall Street coup of 2008, it appears the U.S. House of Representatives is as bought and paid for as ever. We heard about the Citigroup crafted legislation currently being pushed through Congress back in May when Mother Jones reported on it. Fortunately, they included the following image in their article:

Click to Enlarge
Unsurprisingly, the main backer of the bill is notorious Wall Street lackey Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a former Goldman Sachs employee who has discovered lobbyist payoffs can be just as lucrative as a career in financial services. The last time Mr. Himes made an appearance on these pages was in March 2013 in my piece: Congress Moves to DEREGULATE Wall Street.
Fortunately, that bill never made it to a vote on the Senate floor, but now Wall Street is trying to sneak this into a bill needed to keep the government running. You can’t make this stuff up. From the Huffington Post:
WASHINGTON — Wall Street lobbyists are trying to secure taxpayer backing for many derivatives trades as part of budget talks to avert a government shutdown.
According to multiple Democratic sources, banks are pushing hard to include the controversial provision in funding legislation that would keep the government operating after Dec. 11. Top negotiators in the House are taking the derivatives provision seriously, and may include it in the final bill, the sources said.
The bank perks are not a traditional budget item. They would allow financial institutions to trade certain financial derivatives from subsidiaries that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. — potentially putting taxpayers on the hook for losses caused by the risky contracts. Big Wall Street banks had typically traded derivatives from these FDIC-backed units, but the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law required them to move many of the transactions to other subsidiaries that are not insured by taxpayers.
Last year, Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) introduced the same provision under debate in the current budget talks. The legislative text was written by a Citigroup lobbyist, according to The New York Times. The bill passed the House by a vote of 292 to 122 in October 2013, 122 Democrats opposed, and 70 in favor. All but three House Republicans supported the bill.
It wasn’t clear whether the derivatives perk will survive negotiations in the House, or if the Senate will include it in its version of the bill. With Democrats voting nearly 2-to-1 against the bill in the House, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) never brought the bill up for a vote in the Senate.
Remember what Wall Street wants, Wall Street gets.
|
12-08-14 |
THESIS |
FINANCIAL REPRESSION

|
TO TOP |

Tipping Points Life Cycle - Explained
Click on image to enlarge
 |
YOUR SOURCE FOR THE LATEST
GLOBAL MACRO ANALYTIC
THINKING & RESEARCH
|
|
TERMS OF USE |
Gordon T Long is not a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. Of course, he recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.
THE CONTENT OF ALL MATERIALS: SLIDE PRESENTATION AND THEIR ACCOMPANYING RECORDED AUDIO DISCUSSIONS, VIDEO PRESENTATIONS, NARRATED SLIDE PRESENTATIONS AND WEBZINES (hereinafter "The Media") ARE INTENDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
The Media is not a solicitation to trade or invest, and any analysis is the opinion of the author and is not to be used or relied upon as investment advice. Trading and investing can involve substantial risk of loss. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns/results. Commentary is only the opinions of the authors and should not to be used for investment decisions. You must carefully examine the risks associated with investing of any sort and whether investment programs are suitable for you. You should never invest or consider investments without a complete set of disclosure documents, and should consider the risks prior to investing. The Media is not in any way a substitution for disclosure. Suitability of investing decisions rests solely with the investor. Your acknowledgement of this Disclosure and Terms of Use Statement is a condition of access to it. Furthermore, any investments you may make are your sole responsibility.
THERE IS RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING AND INVESTING OF ANY KIND. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
Gordon emperically recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, he encourages you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.
|
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

|
Information herein was obtained from sources which Mr. Long believes reliable, but he does not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities.
Please note that Mr. Long may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are discussed or otherwise covered on this website. Mr. Long does not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security. You should consider this possibility before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you receive from him. |
|
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
COPYRIGHT © Copyright 2010-2011 Gordon T Long. The information herein was obtained from sources which Mr. Long believes reliable, but he does not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that Mr. Long may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website. Mr. Long does not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security. You should consider this possibility before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you receive from him.
|
|