US$
FLIGHT TO PERCEIVVED SAFETY
2014 THEMES |
TRIGGER$ CHARTS |
US DOLLAR |
Q4 2014
MACRO INVESTMENT FOCUS

US DOLLAR

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US DOLLAR SHORTAGE - Fed a Reluctant Dollar Bull
What The Sell-Side Thinks Will Happen To The Dollar Next 03-23-15 Goldman Sachs et al via ZH
"The Fed is a reluctant Dollar bull," explains Goldman Sachs, noting that Yellen inadvertently revealed the FOMC's expectation that coming policy changes will boost the greenback. Broadly speaking the rest of the sell-side has herded along into the strong US Dollar camp with only Unicredit (rate shift may slow recent very strong USD momentum) and Morgan Stanley (suggesting USD corrective activity) backing away from full dollar bull though most suggest adding to dollar longs on any dip as the most crowded trade in the world gets crowded-er.
Goldman Sachs: The Fed Is A Dollar Bull
1. Price action around the last FOMC was jarring. The drop in the Dollar in the immediate aftermath of the meeting was greater than during the “no taper” surprise in September 2013 (Exhibit 1) and conviction that the USD can rally from here has taken a beating.

We have a different take and continue to see large upside for the Dollar. Our reasoning is simple. On the surface, there is no denying that last week was a dovish shift, no doubt in response to the sharp rise in the Dollar in the run-up to the meeting. But what does that shift really signal? In our minds, it is an implicit admission that the normalization of monetary policy – a return to data dependence and lift-off – will boost the Dollar. Last week’s actions thus inadvertently revealed the Fed’s expectations for the greenback, which are that coming policy changes will likely boost the Dollar. In a sense, last week was reminiscent of the SNB’s decision to de-peg in January. That action implicitly signaled an expectation that the Euro could weaken a lot more, making the peg increasingly unsustainable. That “forecast revision,” made in the run-up to the ECB's QE, has of course been borne out. Like the rest of us, central banks have implicit currency views, though in the case of the Fed we have to infer those from actions rather than words. Last week’s switch from “patient” to “not impatient” signaled that normalization is coming, but a reluctance to do so in June, for fear that Dollar strength will get out of hand. The Fed is a reluctant Dollar bull.
2. Of course, it is quite possible that the pace of Dollar appreciation slows from that seen since Chair Yellen’s Humphrey-Hawkins testimony (Exhibit 2). But that is hardly a heroic statement.

The Dollar has seen outsized gains versus the majors recently, which – as discussed in our last FX Views – reflect Dollar positioning that was too pessimistic (it felt to us like the market was expecting a repeat of the kind of weak data we saw a year ago) and rising focus on “patient” coming out of the FOMC statement. It is perfectly normal for the Dollar to consolidate after such a move. Indeed, following large moves, the USD has tended to trade sideways for several weeks at a time. This time is no different most likely, i.e. this is not the end of the bull-run for the Dollar.
3. There is no doubt that the hurdle has risen for labor market data, which Chair Yellen highlighted in giving the FOMC “reasonable confidence.” But it is also important to remember the bigger picture. The bulk of the Dollar rise has been the Euro and Yen weakness, a reflection of regime change at the BoJ and ECB that pushed the 2-year differential sharply in favor of the Dollar (Exhibit 3).

This is why, in our minds at least, the Dollar has been resilient to relatively mixed data in recent months. As such, the hurdle for the Dollar is not really all that high after all. There is an additional facet to this. Last week, Chair Yellen talked back the removal of “patient,” downplaying a June lift-off by saying the Fed would “not be impatient.” Forward guidance, in other words, did not quite leave this time around. Its full removal is another Dollar positive catalyst, which we believe should see the 2-year differential converge further towards the forwards, boosting the Dollar (Exhibit 4).

4. We know we may sound like perma-Dollar bulls. We are not. There will be a turning point, but in our minds that will come once we have gone a lot further towards normalization.
Markets will inevitably front-run monetary policy normalization, so the turn will likely come before the Fed funds target reverts to its historical average.
But is that moment at hand, before the Fed has been able to fully let go of forward guidance, let alone lift-off? We think not.
* * *
And the rest of the sell-side seems to agree... though positioning varies... (via Bloomberg)
Barclays (strategists incl. Dennis Tan)
- Moved estimate for timing of Fed’s first rate hike to Sept. from June following changes to FOMC’s projections; expect target range for federal funds rate to reach 50-75bps in Dec., vs 75-100bps before
- Don’t expect medium-term downward trend in EUR/USD to change after dovish Fed surprise; use rebound as opportunity to establish short positions at a better entry level
- Local data likely to weigh on pair this wk on expectations of slightly firmer U.S. CPI (look for headline reading of +0.3% m/m, core CPI of +0.2% m/m ) and softer euro-area flash PMIs (expect flash composite PMI of 53.5)
- Forecast U.K. March CPI inflation to fall to 0.0% y/y, RPI inflation to drop to 0.8% y/y; may provide some upward pressure to EUR/GBP
- Yuan rebound may be short-lived, sell on rally
BNP Paribas (strategists incl. Vassili Serebriakov)
- The Fed eliminated “patient” but sounded dovish; case for USD appreciation remains intact
- BNP re-enters long USD/JPY at 120.50, targeting 125 with a 118.50 stop
- Recommends buying a 3-mo. EUR/GBP call, financed by a 1-mo. put with expiry before the May 7 U.K. elections, given likelihood of a hung parliament
- All eyes on U.S. and U.K. inflation data in wk ahead
- Goes long EUR/SEK at 9.20, targeting 9.60 with a 9.0550 stop
- SEK appreciation appears to be raising Riksbank concern; with further easing probable, risk-reward favors SEK shorts
BofAML (team incl. Athanasios Vamvakidis)
- Strong USD will lower real GDP growth and inflation, delaying first rate hike to Sept., or even later
- This could slow USD appreciation in short term, but expect mkt to continue taking advantage of any USD dips to buy more
- Increased concern about negative scenarios in Greece, which could trigger further EUR downside
- Recommends buying a 3m EUR/JPY put spread, as a continued fall in EUR/USD could weigh on risk sentiment given its positive correlation with equities
- Remain constructive on peripheral spreads with carry trades expected to get further boost from QE and TLTROs
Credit Suisse (team incl. Ray Farris)
- USD sensitive to weak data surprises in light of last wk’s Fed press conference as they could further support expectations that FOMC will wait for longer before hiking
- Remain fundamentally USD bullish; use consolidation to add longs at better levels, especially vs EUR
- EUR-specific drivers likely to be on the back burner for the time being; remain EUR bearish, think slow-and-steady increase in Greek bond yields could be a harbinger of increased volatility, potential credit risk down the line
- Turned bearish on GBP, on view low inflation and election risk will increasingly weigh on currency
- Expect Japan core CPI ex VAT hike to continue moderating, to 0.1% y/y; bias remains for USD/JPY topside towards CS’s 3-mo. forecast of 125
- Risk is still for a weaker CNY and CNH trajectory with outflows likely to remain high in the coming mos. and CNY trade-weighted index at a record high
Societe Generale (team incl. Olivier Korber)
- Dovish Fed switch could trigger USD profit-taking in coming wks; EUR/USD should ultimately reach parity even as road will be bumpier from here
- Relief rally in EM assets on back of Fed to be short-lived; ready to fade rally, remain tactically bearish on GEM
- In EM FX, still want to sell TRY, while call for steeper curves in a number of local rates markets, especially Poland and Korea
- Sudden end of former Swiss FX policy has severely challenged credibility of potential future SNB actions, including FX interventions; limits scope of CHF weakness
- CHF strength and deflation raise the possibility of a liquidity trap
- Initiate long NOK/SEK spot position; revived monetary-policydivergence should lift pair toward 1.10
Morgan Stanley (team incl. Hans Redeker)
- Removing the word “patient” from FOMC statement has increased Fed’s flexibility to tighten whenever it sees the need to act
- Yield and interest-rate differentials have become less dollar-supportive, suggesting USD corrective activity
- USD exposure reduced, tightened stops on remaining USD long positions
- Trades such as long JPY/KRW and long CLP/COP provide relative value
- Greece and local French elections next weekend are EUR-specific risk events, limiting euro rebounds
- CAD/JPY shorts offer value, with the steep fall of oil prices undermining the CAD outlook
- Further commodity-price weakness isn’t fully priced in
UniCredit (strategists incl. Vasileios Gkionakis)
- FOMC’s downward shift in interest-rate projections may halt recent very strong USD momentum
- Therefore, most important U.S. data – CPI and durable orders - unlikely to re-ignite strength across the board
- Euro-area data have potential to push EUR/USD even higher
- Preliminary March EMU PMI surveys should post fourth consecutive increase for both manufacturing and service
- Together with a stronger German Ifo Business Climate for March, likely to offer EUR/USD more fuel
- Any further deterioration in Japan Feb. inflation will keep the market warm to the possibility of additional stimulus
- High level of uncertainty around general election, dovish BOE likely to weigh on the GBP; CPI release might add some pressure
* * *
So, The Sell-Side would like you to buy Dollars (from them) on every dip...

And then Stan Fischer explained...
- *FISCHER SAYS DOLLAR WON'T KEEP RISING FOREVER.
Wait what?!
* * *
Reflecting on today's significant weakness in the Dollar, the Goldman traders noted...
USD weakness continues today but unlike last week the move today was on much lighter flows.
We were net better sellers of USD across the board but I think some of that is position reduction given the high level of realized vol we’ve seen. EURUSD has had at least a 125bp move day/day the last 4 sessions. Will be interesting to see if the USD rally can reignite once things calm down because recent FED speak continues to emphasize that a rate hike could come mid-year.
|
03-28-15 |
SII
US
DOLLAR |
|
US DOLLAR SHORTAGE - A USD Liquidity Problem
On Wednesday afternoon, just after the close of the market, the US Dollar, the world's reserve currency flash crashed. This is how the WSJ described the move:
In the latest episode Wednesday, a message from the U.S. Federal Reserve that it is in no hurry to raise interest rates caused a big slump in the dollar, which has run up a huge rally so far this year. The euro surged more than 4% against the buck, its biggest jump in a single day in 15 years, according to Deutsche Bank. Early on Thursday, the European currency resumed its slide.
The sheer speed of the round trip in the euro-dollar exchange rate—the world’s most heavily traded currency pair—left traders and investors reeling.
We profiled the staggering move in real-time as it was happening:



Again, this is the world's reserve currency, not some two-bit backwater currency pair. It was, also, a stunning, unheard of event.
This is how the rest of America's traders saw it, from the WSJ:
“I haven’t seen anything like it since the financial crisis,” said Paul Lambert, head of currency at Insight Investment, which manages $480 billion of assets.
Traders said Wednesday’s move brought back memories of January’s surge in the Swiss franc, when the currency climbed more than 40% after the Swiss central bank abandoned its policy of capping the franc’s strength against the euro. For a few minutes on Wednesday, the lack of dollar buyers caused a short-term freeze in electronic trading platforms, according to a New York-based trader at a major currency-dealing bank. “There was a lot of shouting on the desk, a lot of nervousness,” the trader said.
“The dollar has been experiencing fastest pace of ascent in 40 years. Our long-term outlook for the euro is still lower, but risk here is for a decent pullback,” said Matthew Cobon, head of interest rates and currencies at Threadneedle Investments in London, which has a total $54.3 billion of assets. Mr. Cobon had bet on a bounce back for the euro ahead of Wednesday’s Fed meeting.
None of this was unexpected, if only to our readers: recall that as we showed in the start of the year, the short 10Y and the long USD were the two most crowded, biggest consensus trades across the spec investor community, perhaps in history.
But while everyone got crushed on the Short 10Year trade shortly thereafter, the USD trade kept working... until Wednesday, when the entire groupthink monorail slammed into a brick wall.
So now what? Well, more of the same... and prayer.
The sharp swings also raise a now-familiar complaint from investors: Regulations brought in after the financial crisis have dried up the liquidity in markets, by crimping banks’ ability to carry risky bets on their balance sheets.
On Wednesday, the Bank for International Settlements became the latest major authority to caution that a lack of liquidity could lead to major disruptions in financial markets.
“When flow hits the market, there’s no buffer, so it translates straight into big price moves,” said Mr. Lambert at Insight Investment. During the financial crisis, big swings were sparked by fears of a collapse of the banking system. Similar moves can now result from a minor reassessment of the Fed’s rate-increase plans, according to Mr. Lambert.
So to summarize:
- the stock market flash crash of May 6, 2021
- the Treasury bond flash crash of October 15, 2021
- and now the US Dollar flash crash of March 18, 2021
And all of this happening as the "market" is rising, and as of today, poised to set new all time highs.
What happens when the real selling actually begins, and what little liquidity exists even now, is completely gone.
The answer? Exchanges will simply close down and refuse to open or satisfy any asset liquidation demands, indefinitely, until either the Fed can once again bailout the system, or when the US government finally makes the sale of any asset, illegal.
|
03-21-15 |
SII
US
DOLLAR |
|
US DOLLAR SHORTAGE - A USD Liquidity Problem
Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith of OfTwoMinds blog,
Borrowing in USD was risk-on; buying USD is risk-off.
There is a lively debate about the global demand for U.S. dollars:
Correspondent Mark G. went through the BIS report and offered these insightful comments:
1. Almost all of the dollar denominated debt and bond growth since 2009 was generated by the global shadow banking system.
- Banks per se were smaller players in issuing this debt, and US-based banks (i.e. the ones in reach of Federal Reserve life preservers) were minor.
- Sovereign wealth funds are large players in this. When we think of huge sovereign wealth funds held by major hydrocarbon exporters then the pucker factor rises.
One implied result of the BIS paper is that it will be extremely difficult or impossible for Federal Reserve emergency liquidity operations to stem a panic, even if the Fed is inclined to do so. AEP in the Telegraph article stated this more directly. The real problem is that modern bailout operations have large fiscal components as well as monetary components. Looking at the Bundestag's chronic heartburn with Greece and the EFSF is educational. Alternatively, consider how well proposals for a larger TARP type program aimed primarily at foreign entities would be received by the US Congress. And especially in 2016.
2. A major revelation was that $1 trillion of the dollarized lending went into Chinese companies. However the authors claim most of this lending was through Chinese banks.
3. "Emerging Markets" again account for 1/2 of the total offshore dollarized loans and bonds. This is $4.5 trillion and mainly centered in Brazil, Russia, India, China, etc.
"Fourth, since the crisis, the Federal Reserve's compression of term premia via its bond buying has led to a surge in US dollar borrowing through bond markets. Time-varying regressions and VAR analysis also indicate that inflows into bond mutual funds played a significant role in transmitting monetary ease, giving evidence of the portfolio rebalancing channel of the Federal Reserve large-scale bond purchases. In particular, given the low expected returns of holding US Treasury bonds (in relation to expected short-term rates), investors have sought out and found dollar bond issuers outside the US, many rated BBB and thus offering a welcome credit spread."
These dollarized bond funds were the "conservative" play for those players unwilling to also assume exchange rate risk.
"BBB..." This is already the S&P/Fitch ground floor of "investment grade." And that was the rating assigned to these foreign issuers during a time of free money and bubble expansion. We already know the bulk of bond mutual fund buyers are institutions. And many are required to flush any paper that falls below investment grade. And being 'smart money' they will have tried to hedge their risks against such a 'Credit Event' with credit default swaps (CDS).
We also know that CDS contracts typically require the CDS writer to begin posting progressively higher amounts of cash collateral as the credit outlook darkens for the underlying instrument. For instance, even if S&P/Fitch merely change the outlook from 'positive' to 'neutral' the required posted collateral percentage rises. And again from neutral to negative and so forth.
In the case of dollar loans and bonds the collateral needs to be in dollars. Therefore even if the CDS writer manages to borrow Euros with wet ink they still have to exchange these for dollars. See USD/Euro FX trend for the result."
Thank you, Mark, for the detailed analysis. Here are my initial thoughts:
1. Currencies respond to supply and demand like any other commodity. As such, it's instructive to to look at the supply of U.S. dollars and see how it's changed since 2008:money supply (Wikipedia)

2. However you measure money supply, the supply of dollars hasn't risen by much: MZM Money Stock has risen $2 trillion since 2010, Adjusted Monetary Base rose from $1 trillion to $3 trillion, and M2 Money Stock from around $8 trillion to around $10 trillion.
To put that roughly $2 trillion increase in money supply in context:
The GDP of the U.S. is about $17 trillion.
Global GDP is around $72 trillion.
Global debt rose $57 trillion from 2007 to 2014:
3. If there is demand for $9 trillion USD, that dwarfs the increase in US money supply. It also dwarfs the expansion in the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, roughly $3.5 trillion since 2008.
4. Borrowing in U.S. dollars was the easy, profitable trade as long as the dollar was declining. Traders being traders, everybody jumped into the easy, profitable trade with all four feet. Now that the dollar has reversed, everyone who is holding debt in dollars is losing money every time the USD ticks higher.
5. Much of the shadow banking system is opaque, and assumptions made about the outstanding debt in USD are likely to be not just wrong but grossly under-estimated. See #2 above.
If you wanted a trade that was guaranteed to blow up, you couldn't do much better than "dollar bond issuers outside the US, many rated BBB." As Mark noted, once this gunwales-at-sea-level debt gets downgraded a notch, institutional owners will be obligated to sell, regardless of any other conditions. Selling will beget selling.
6. U.S. Treasuries are essentially the only super-liquid safe haven offering a yield above 1%. And what do you need to buy Treasuries? U.S. dollars. The point here is the demand for USD is not limited to those scrambling for USD to pay off dollar-denominated debt--it's a global consequence of the global economy skidding off the cliff into recession.
Borrowing in USD was risk-on; buying USD is risk-off. As the real global economy slips into recession, risk-on trades in USD-denominated debt are blowing up and those seeking risk-off liquidity and safe yields are scrambling for USD-denominated assets.
It's important to recall that buyers of U.S. Treasuries are getting not just the 2+% yield-- they're getting the capital appreciation from the USD rising against their home currency. Depending on the home currency, those who dumped their home currency and bought USD last summer have gained 17% to 25%, even if they received 0% yield.
Add all this up and we have to conclude that, in terms of demand for USD--you ain't seen nuthin' yet.
|
03-21-15 |
SII
US
DOLLAR |
|
US DOLLAR SHORTAGE - Central Bank Driven
The Global Dollar Funding Shortage Is Back With A Vengeance And "This Time It's Different" 03-08-15 Zero Hedge
The last time the world was sliding into a US dollar shortage as rapidly as it is right now, was following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. The response by the Fed: the issuance of an unprecedented amount of FX liquidity lines in the form of swaps to foreign Central Banks. The "swapped" amount went from practically zero to a peak of $582 billion on December 10, 2008.

The USD shortage back, and the Fed's subsequent response, was the topic of one of our most read articles of mid-2009, "How The Federal Reserve Bailed Out The World."
As we discussed back then, this
systemic dollar shortage was primarily the result of imbalanced FX funding at the global commercial banks, arising from first Japanese, and then European banks' abuse of a USD-denominated asset-liability mismatch, in which the dollar being the funding currency of choice, resulted in a massive matched synthetic "Dollar short" on the books of commercial bank desks around the globe: a shortage which in the aftermath of the Lehman failure manifested itself in what was the largest global USD margin call in history.
This is how the BIS described first the mechanics of the shortage:
The accumulation of US dollar assets saddled banks with significant funding requirements, which they scrambled to meet during the crisis, particularly in the weeks following the Lehman bankruptcy. To better understand these financing needs, we break down banks’ assets and liabilities by currency to examine cross-currency funding, or the extent to which banks fund in one currency and invest in another. We find that, since 2000, the Japanese and the major European banking systems took on increasingly large net (assets minus liabilities) on-balance sheet positions in foreign currencies, particularly in US dollars. While the associated currency exposures were presumably hedged off-balance sheet, the build-up of net foreign currency positions exposed these banks to foreign currency funding risk, or the risk that their funding positions (FX swaps) could not be rolled over.

... And then the subsequent global public response:
The severity of the US dollar shortage among banks outside the United States called for an international policy response. While European central banks adopted measures to alleviate banks’ funding pressures in their domestic currencies, they could not provide sufficient US dollar liquidity. Thus they entered into temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (swap lines) with the Federal Reserve in order to channel US dollars to banks in their respective jurisdictions (Figure 7). Swap lines with the ECB and the Swiss National Bank were announced as early as December 2007. Following the failure of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, however, the existing swap lines were doubled in size, and new lines were arranged with the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan, bringing the swap lines total to $247 billion. As the funding disruptions spread to banks around the world, swap arrangements were extended across continents to central banks in Australia and New Zealand, Scandinavia, and several countries in Asia and Latin America, forming a global network (Figure 7). Various central banks also entered regional swap arrangements to distribute their respective currencies across borders.
The amount of the implied dollar short was also calculated by the BIS.
he major European banks’ US dollar funding gap had reached $1.0–1.2 trillion by mid-2007. Until the onset of the crisis, European banks had met this need by tapping the interbank market ($432 billion) and by borrowing from central banks ($386 billion), and used FX swaps ($315 billion) to convert (primarily) domestic currency funding into dollars. If we assume that these banks’ liabilities to money market funds (roughly $1 trillion, Baba et al (2009)) are also short-term liabilities, then the estimate of their US dollar funding gap in mid-2007 would be $2.0–2.2 trillion. Were all liabilities to non-banks treated as short-term funding, the upper-bound estimate would be $6.5 trillion (Figure 5, bottom right panel).

One thing to keep in mind as reading the above (and the linked article as a refresher), is that the massive USD synthetic short, and resulting margin call, was entirely due to the actions of commercial banks, with central banks having to step in subsequently and bail them out using any and every (such as FX swaps) mechanism possible.
* * *
Why do we bring all of this up now, nearly 6 years later? Because, as JPM observed over the weekend while looking at the dollar fx basis, the shortage in dollar funding is back and is accelerating at pace not seen since the Lehman collapse.
The good news: said shortage is not quite as acute yet as it was in either 2008/2009 or on November 30 2011 (recall "Here Comes The Global, US-Funded Liquidity Bail Out") when just as Europe was again on the verge of collapse, the Fed re-upped the ante on its global swap lines when it pushed the swap rate from OIS+100 bps to OIS+50 bps.
The bad news: at the current pace of dollar funding needs, it is almost certain that the tumble in the dollar fx basis will accelerate until it hits its practical minimum of - 50 bps, which is the floor as per the Fed-ECB swap line.
But the real news is that unlike the last time, when the global USD funding shortage was entirely the doing of commercial banks, this time it is the central banks' own actions that have led to this global currency funding mismatch - a mismatch that unlike 2008, and 2011, can not be simply resolved by further central bank intervention which happen to be precisely the reason for the mismatch in the first place.
In other words, central banks have managed to corner themselves in yet another policy cul-de-sac, six years after they did everything in their power to undo the last one.
Here is how JPM's Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou frames the problem:
The decline in the cross currency swap basis across most USD pairs in recent months is raising questions regarding a shortage in dollar funding. The fx basis reflects the relative supply and demand for dollar vs. foreign currency funds and a very negative basis currently points to relative shortage of USD funding or relative abundance of funding in other currencies. Such supply and demand imbalances can create big shifts in the fx basis away from its actuarial value of zero. Figure 1 shows that the dollar fx basis weighted across eight DM and EM currencies, declined significantly over the past year to its lowest level since mid 2013, although it remains well above the lows seen during the depths of the Lehman or the Euro debt crisis.

It does indeed, for now, however read on for why the current basis reading just shy of -20 bps will almost certainly accelerate until and unless there is a dramatic convergence in the policies of the Fed and the other "developed world" central banks.
First, what are currency and fx swaps, and why does anyone care?
"Cross currency swaps and FX swaps encompass similar structures which allow investors to raise funds in a particular currency, e.g. the dollar from other funding currencies such as the euro. For example an institution which has dollar funding needs can raise euros in euro funding markets and convert the proceeds into dollar funding obligations via an FX swap. The only difference between cross currency swaps and FX swaps is that the former involves the exchange of floating rates during the contract term. Since a cross currency swap involves the exchange of two floating currencies, the two legs of the swap should be valued at par and thus the basis should be theoretically zero. But in periods when perceptions about credit risk or supply and demand imbalances in funding markets make the demand for one currency (e.g. the dollar) high vs. another currency (e.g. the euro), then the basis can be negative as a substantial premium is needed to convince an investor to exchange dollars against a foreign currency, i.e. to enter a swap where he receives USD Libor flat, an investor will want to pay Euribor minus a spread (because the basis is negative)."
One read of a substantial divergence from par in the fx basis is that there may be substantial counterparty concerns within the banking system - this was main reinforcing mechanism for the first basis blow out of the basis back in 2008.
Both cross currency and FX swaps are subjected to counterparty and credit risk by a lot more than interest rate swaps due to the exchange of notional amounts. As such the pricing of these contracts is affected by perceptions about the creditworthiness of the banking system. The Japanese banking crisis of the 1990s caused a structurally negative basis in USD/JPY cross currency swaps. Similarly the European debt crisis of 2010/2012 was associated with a sustained period of very negative basis in USD/EUR cross currency swaps.
As noted above, the fundamental reasons for the USD shortage then vs now are vastly different. Back then, financial globalization meant that "Japanese banks had accumulated a large amount of dollar assets during the 1980s and 1990s. Similarly European banks accumulating a large amount of dollar assets during 2000s created structural US dollar funding needs. The Japanese banking crisis of 1990s made Japanese banks less creditworthy in dollar funding markets and they had to pay a premium to convert yen funding into dollar funding. Similarly the Euro debt crisis created a banking crisis making Euro area banks less worthy from a counterparty/credit risk point of view in dollar funding markets.
As dollar funding markets including fx swap markets dried up, these funding needs took the form of an acute dollar shortage."
And as further noted above, while there is no banking crisis (at this moment) unlike virtually every other year in the post-Lehman collapse as commercial banks are flooded in global central bank liquidity (now that central banks are set to inject more liquidity in 2015 than in any prior year, 2008 and 20099 included) the catalyst for the current shortage are central banks themselves:
Given the absence of a banking crisis currently, what is causing negative basis? The answer is monetary policy divergence. The ECB’s and BoJ’s QE coupled with a chorus of rate cuts across DM and EM central banks has created an imbalance between supply and demand across funding markets. Funding conditions have become a lot easier outside the US with QE-driven liquidity injections and rate cuts raising the supply of euro and other currency funding vs. dollar funding. This divergence manifested itself as one-sided order flow in cross currency swap markets causing a decline in the basis.
Who would have ever thought that a stingy Fed could be sowing the seeds of the next financial crisis (don't answer that rhetorical question).
For those who are curious about where this mismatch is manifesting itself in practical terms, look no further than the amount of USD (expensive) vs non-USD (i.e., EUR, i.e., very cheap thanks to NIRP) denominated cross-border debt issuance:
Do we see these funding imbalances in debt issuance? The answer is yes if one looks at cross border corporate issuance. Figure 2 shows how EUR denominated corporate bond issuance by non-European issuers (Reverse Yankee issuance) spiked this year as percentage of total EUR denominated corporate issuance. Similarly Figure 3 shows how Yankee issuance, the share of USD denominated corporate issuance by non-US companies, declined sharply this year. In other words, cross border issuance trends are consistent with higher supply of EUR funding vs. USD funding. We get a similar picture in value terms. Reverse Yankee issuance totaled €47bn YTD which annualized is twice as big as last year’s pace. Yankee issuance totaled $41bn YTD which represents a decline of more than 30% from last year’s annualized pace.

Which makes sense: why would US multinationals, already hurting by the surge in the USD on their income statement, also suffer this move on the balance sheet and pay about 50 bps more for the same piece of paper issued in Europe? They won't, of course, however in the process they will hedge fx, and push the basis even further into negative territory. JPM explains:
Does this cross border issuance have a currency impact? It depends. For example, if a US company issues in EUR and swaps back into USD to effectively achieve cheaper synthetic USD funding rather than issuing directly in US dollar funding markets, the transaction has no currency impact. This synthetic USD funding especially attractive right now as credit spreads over swaps are much tighter in Europe than in the US by around 40bp-50bp for A-rated corporate currently in intermediate maturities, which more than offsets the negative fx basis. This means there is a significant yield advantage for US companies using synthetic USD funding (i.e. issuing in EUR and swapping back into USD rather than issuing in USD directly). In theory, the USD-EUR credit spread difference of Figure 4 suggests that the fx basis has room to widen by another 20bp, i.e. to decline to -50bp before the yield advantage of synthetic USD funding disappears. For the EURUSD, the basis cannot go below -50bp as this is the floor implied by the ECB’s FX swap line with the Fed.

And there you have it: all else equal, there is at least enough downside to push the fx basis as far negative at -50 bps: this would make the USD shortage the most acute it has ever been, at least as calculated by this key metric! And since this is essentially a risk-free arb for credit issuers, and since there are many more stock buybacks that demand credit funding, one can be certain that the current fx basis print around - 20 bps will most certainly accelerate to a level never before seen, a level which would also hint that something is very broken with the financial system and/or that transatlantic counterparty risk has never been greater.
Unlike us, JPM hedges modestly in its forecast where the basis will end up:
Whether the above YTD trends continue forward is a difficult call to make. The widening of USD vs. EUR credit spreads shown in Figure 4 has the propensity to sustain the strength of Reverse Yankee issuance putting more downward pressure on the basis. On the other hand, this potential downward pressure on the basis should be offset to some extent by Yankee issuance the attractiveness of which increases the more negative the basis becomes.
JPM's punchline:
In all, different to previous episodes of dollar funding shortage such as the ones experienced during the Lehman crisis or during the euro debt crisis, the current one is not driven by banks. It is rather driven by the monetary policy divergence between the US and the rest of the world. This divergence appears to have created an imbalance in funding markets and a shortage in dollar funding. It is important to monitor how this dollar funding shortage and issuance patterns evolve over time even if the currency implications are uncertain.
And to think the Fed's cheerleaders couldn't hold their praise for the ECB's NIRP (as first defined on these pages) policy. Because little did they know that behind the scenes the divergence in Fed and "rest of the world" policy action is leading to two things:
i) the fastest emergence of a dollar shortage since Lehman and
ii) a shortage which will be arbed to a level not seen since Lehman, and one which assures that over the coming next few months, many will be scratching their heads as to whether there is something far more broken with the financial system than merely an arbed way by US corporations to issue cheaper (hedged) debt in Europe thanks to Europe's NIRP policies.
If and when the market finally does notice this gaping dollar shortage (as is usually the case with the mandatory 3-6 month delay), watch as the Fed will once again scramble to flood the world with USD FX swap lines in yet another desperate attempt to prevent the global dollar margin call from crushing a matched synthetic dollar short which according to some estimates has risen as high as $10 trillion.
Until then, just keep an eye on the Fed's weekly swap line usage, because if the above is correct, it is only a matter of time before they are put to full use once again.
Finally what assures they will be put to use, is that this time the divergence is the direct result of the Fed's actions, and its insistence that despite what is shaping up to be a 1% GDP quarter, that it has to hike rates. Well, as JPM just warned it in not so many words, be very careful what you wish for, and what you end up getting in your desire to telegraph just how "strong" the US economy is.
|
03-14-15 |
SII
US
DOLLAR |
|
The U.S. unemployment rate has dropped to 5.5%, cut almost in half from the 2009 high. The rate is down 1.2 percentage points from a year ago, back to the June 2008 level. Yet the Fed funds rate remains stuck at near zero. The Fed’s balance sheet increased $325bn the past year, while having inflated about $3.6 TN from its pre-crisis level. Securities prices have inflated to unprecedented levels.
The objective of the Fed’s extraordinary policy course over the last six years has been to:
- Spur risk-taking,
- Asset market reflation,
- Stimulative wealth effects and resulting economic recovery.
Superficially, Federal Reserve monetary inflation appears to have worked. Yet beneath the facade exist
- Extreme imbalances and maladjustment.
- U.S. and global securities markets have been incredibly distorted.
- The American and global Credit addiction has only worsened.
Such harsh realities cannot be disregarded forever.
Fed policymaking has provided a competitive advantage to financial assets over real economy investment.
Rate, monetization and liquidity policies have afforded competitive advantage to speculation at the expense of savings.
The overall outcome should be of little surprise: speculative excess, asset Bubbles and financial engineering galore. And as the Fed falls further behind the curve, Bubble excess turns conspicuous. Mark Cuban blogged this week, “Why This Tech Bubble is Worse Than the Tech Bubble of 2000.” CNBC had a Friday segment, “Bubble Trouble in Biotech?” From Bloomberg, also on Friday: “Biotech Keeps Rising as Investors Worry ‘End Is Coming’”. There is as well greater recognition of Bubble excess that has enveloped corporate debt and derivatives markets. These days, confirmation of the multi-asset class “Granddaddy of All Bubbles” thesis is apparent about everywhere.
Meanwhile, the global situation – markets, economies and geopolitics - turns progressively unstable. At this point,
I am highly confident in my thesis that the global Bubble has been pierced (with profound ramifications!).
This view is supported by the self-reinforcing nature of the collapse in energy and commodities prices along with faltering EM currencies.
At the same time, general risk aversion and destabilizing “hot money” exodus have been held at bay by the unprecedented central bank liquidity slushing around the global financial “system.” Typical contagion effects have yet to attain momentum. The bullish view holds that policymaking has lessened global systemic risk. I instead believe unprecedented policy-induced distortions have created a bursting dam dilemma. EM securities prices remain completely out-of-whack when compared to the unfolding reality. Acute EM systemic fragility has been masked by central bank policies and historic speculative excess.
A Friday afternoon Bloomberg headline raised a pertinent issue: “Why the Strong Jobs Report May Have Caused the Stock Market to Tumble.” I’ll attempt an explanation.
First of all, the bond market was clobbered. The June long-bond futures contract was slammed for over three points, with yields rising 16 bps (to 2.46%). Ten-year Treasury yields jumped 13 bps, with yields up a notable 25 bps for the week. Two-year government yields increased eight bps Friday to 0.725% (high since December), and December Eurodollars jumped nine basis points to 0.865%.
The conventional view holds that Friday’s strong non-farm payroll report increases the odds of a June rate increase. Importantly, the markets must face the uncertainty of a now rapidly approaching reversal after six years of unprecedented easy “money.” And while the markets remain confident the Yellen Fed will approach “normalization” with the most cautious little baby-steps imaginable, the key market issue at this point is the great uncertainty associated with years of policy-induced market excess and distortions. It’s worth noting that EM bonds suffered much more dramatic Friday losses than Treasuries.
Friday trading saw South African yields surged 25 bps, Colombia 20 bps, Turkey 18 bps, Brazil 15 bps, Mexico 16 bps, Hungary 25 bps and Poland 17 bps. And EM currencies took one on the chin. Friday action saw the Mexican peso fall 2.0%, Brazilian real 2.0%, Czech Koruna 1.9%, Bulgarian lev 1.7%, Hungarian forint 1.7%, Romanian leu 1.7%, South African rand 1.7%, Colombian peso 1.5% and Polish zloty 1.4%.
From my perspective,
Friday may have provided The Tipping Point for King Dollar.
The Dollar Index jumped 1.3% during Friday’s session to the highest level since 2003. The dollar is now in its most powerful advance since King Dollar’s heyday back in the late-nineties. The King Dollar speculative dynamic is also turning highly destabilizing.
Interestingly, at the top of the Periphery Fragility List, Brazil and Turkey saw their currencies this week hammered 7.3% and 4.4%, respectively. Brazilian (real) 10-year bond yields surged 69 bps to 12.97%. Brazilian stocks were hit for 3.1%, giving back all 2015 gains. Turkish (dollar) yields jumped 37 bps this week to the highest level since December (4.68%). Turkish stocks sank 4.6%, also to the low since December.
Despite all the talk of global deflation risk, Brazil and Turkey (among others) have inflation problems. Bloomberg: “Brazil Posts Fastest Annual Inflation in Almost a Decade.” Consumer price inflation has been running above 9% in Turkey for much of the past year. Rapidly devaluing currencies now exacerbate inflationary pressures – the ugly old vicious cycle taking hold (that the printing press can’t rectify).
For the most part (excluding Ukraine, Venezuela and Russia), EM bond markets have held their own – even in the face of faltering EM Bubbles. I’ll Credit this feat largely to the Fed’s intransigent zero-rate policy; BOJ and ECB liquidity injections; Chinese fiscal and monetary stimulus; and, in general, huge interest-rate differentials to “developed” bonds coupled with a massive (and expanding) pool of global speculative finance. And as King Dollar pressured commodities and EM currencies, global deflationary fears were fanned. This ensured that the dovish Fed stayed put at zero, which accommodated “Bubble On” and resulting runaway Bubbles throughout U.S. securities markets. Domestic and global fragilities ensured unrelenting “do whatever it takes” monetary stimulus from the ECB and BOJ that, when coupled with U.S. excess, provided ample fuel for a more globalized “Bubble On.”
But the global pool of speculative finance became too massive and unwieldy, while yen and euro devaluation got out of hand. Global securities markets became too leveraged. The resulting King Dollar Dynamic ensured that global “hot money” flooded into U.S. asset markets (stocks, bonds, real estate, tech, biotech, energy, private businesses, etc.). Reminiscent of the late-nineties, this dynamic became a self-reinforcing Bubble. The stronger the dollar, the more pressure on EM – inciting flows out of the faltering Periphery to the bubbling Core.
Considering the U.S. financial and economic backdrops, rates – Fed funds to long-bond – are much too low. The prospect of the Fed commencing rate “normalization” only throws more gas on King Dollar. This applies more pressure on EM currencies and commodities, which further stokes King Dollar.
The King Dollar Tipping Point comes when EM markets turn disorderly – currencies and bonds.
Disorderly is spurred by the prospect of companies, financial institutions and countries not having the wherewithal to service dollar-denominated obligations. And be mindful of critical market psychology: King Dollar ensures that investors in dollar-denominated debt are for a while willing to overlook a lot of EM fundamental deterioration. There comes, however, a Tipping Point where investors begin to fret the ability of the EM debtor to service debts and stabilize economies while avoiding the printing press. There comes a time when nervous speculators move to hedge exposure. There arrives a Tipping Point where market illiquidity becomes a serious concern.
I believe stocks were hit hard on Friday because a surging dollar and U.S. bond yields now push EM bond markets a big step closer to a disorderly “Risk Off” dynamic. A surprise jump in global yields would portend problematic de-leveraging. I wrote last week that every fledgling Risk Off should now be monitored closely.
The global system is much more vulnerable to a liquidity event than is commonly perceived.
The global leveraged speculating community continues to struggle with performance – hence is susceptible to losses, de-leveraging, redemptions and more liquidity pressure on global markets. There is also the important issue of de-risking/de-leveraging dynamics throughout the global commodities complex having already negatively impacted the liquidity backdrop. Moreover, the Fed has ended QE and the pressure is now on the Fed to begin normalizing rates.
It’s been an important part of my thesis for a while now that the next meaningful de-risking/de-leveraging episode would be poised for unexpected tumult. Yet each fledgling “Risk Off” was met with comforting words and liquidity from the Fed and global central bankers more generally. But I’ll presume (for now) that a 5.5% unemployment rate and elevated securities prices will dissuade the Fed from quickly restarting QE. Meanwhile,
ECB and BOJ QE feed an increasingly destabilizing King Dollar,
much to the expense of the likes of Brazil, Turkey, Mexico, South Africa, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc.
And there’s another King Dollar wildcard worth pondering: China’s renminbi. As I touched on last week, King Dollar creates a serious dilemma for Chinese officials. Chinese exporters became less competitive again this week. And there is increasing focus on the possibility of destabilizing outflows from China. Meanwhile, Chinese officials admitted to expanding difficulties, including rising inequality. An ongoing parabolic dollar move might force their hand on de-pegging their currency from King Dollar.
While U.S. stock and bonds were under pressure this week, for the most part spreads were well-behaved. The yen was also under pressure, weakness that supports the “yen carry trade” and global leverage more generally.
For Risk Off to attain momentum, I would expect to see spreads widen and the yen to catch a bid. And with Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, South African and others under pressure late this week, markets are on the brink of a full-fledged EM problem - a King Dollar Tipping Point.
|
03-07-15 |
SII
US
DOLLAR |
|
Did the Dollar Get its Groove Back? 02-28-15 Marc To Market
The US dollar traded higher against most of the major currencies over the past week. No thanks to Yellen's testimony before Congress. Market participants took away from her a reduced chance of a mid-year rate hike.
We disagree with the interpretation, seeing her comments as 1) playing down lowflation as transitory and 2) seeing the global influence being overall balanced as the decline in oil prices and interest rates offset the dollar's appreciation. We continue to expect the FOMC to drop its "patient" forward guidance at its mid-March meeting.
The main impetus for the dollar appeared to come from the sharp drop in European interest rates. Germany auctioned five- and seven-year bonds with a negative yield. Record low 10-year yields were recorded in at least eight eurozone members. This includes Ireland's 10-year benchmark yield falling below 1% and Portugal's 10-year yield falling below 2%. Spread compression continues. It is being driven by anticipation of the ECB's sovereign bond purchases.
The ECB's bond buying program is expected to be launched after next week's policy making meeting (in Cyprus). It still appears to be some necessary technical and legal details to be worked out before the Eurosystem can begin implementing the new program.
The Dollar Index held support seen near 94.00 and moved within spitting distance of the high set in late-January just above 95.50. The MACDs are poised to cross higher, as are the slow Stochastics, but the RSI is neutral. On balance, we view the consoldiative phase in recent weeks as building a base for a new leg up.
Over the past month, the market tried several times to push the euro through the $1.15 level. It failed. Previous support in the $1.1265 area may now offer resistance. It is difficult to talk about strong support. The push below $1.1l in late-January was brief. That area remains the next immediate target, but we suspect the $1.10 area may be more important psychologically.
We often argue that the dollar-yen is a range-bound currency, and when it looks like it is trending, it is moving from one range to another. It has been in narrowing range since December. Indeed, the January range was inside the December range, and the February range was inside the January range. The technical indicators that we use do not give us much hope of a near-term break of the JPY118-JPY120.50 trading range. On the medium-term, we continue to anticipate an eventual upside break.
The technical tone of sterling remains constructive. Since pushing above the 20-day moving average on February 3, sterling has stayed above it and managed to poke through $1.55 for the first time since the start of the year. Although it failed to establish a foothold above there, we do not think the market has given up on it. Our reading of the technicals suggests that there may be one more leg up that could get sterling closer to $1.56. Firm PMI readings in the week ahead could help solidify expectations that the BOE will be the next major central bank to hike rates after the US.
Over the past two weeks the dollar has tested its 100-day moving average against the Swiss franc. It is found near CHF0.9550, and the dollar has stalled. Technical indicators are not generating strong signals. The key potential key reversal on February 20 did not spur any follow through dollar selling. Recall that the euro also posted a key reversal on February 20. The euro did not make a new high and spent most of the week within the February 20 range. The euro has held above CHF1.05 since February 13.
The US dollar has been carving out what appears to be a consolidative triangle pattern throughout February. The bottom of the triangle is fairly flat around CAD1.2350. The down sloping top of the triangle comes in near CAD1.25 by the end of the week. The key drivers may be whether the Bank of Canada takes out additional insurance next week by cutting rates again and whether oil prices recover further. A strong US employment report at the end of the week could renew speculation of a Fed hike in June. We anticipate a break out to the upside but are also aware that the pattern is notorious for false breaks.
Ideas that the Reserve Bank of Australia may not cut rates next week helped to briefly push the Aussie through $0.7900. However, weak capex has kept the OIS, and forward markets nearly evenly split. If the RBA does not cut rates in March, it will simply raise the conviction levels that a cut will be delivered in Q2. A number of participants expect two cuts to be delivered. We are more inclined to sell into Aussie gains, which the technical indicators still are consistent with, toward $0.7940-50 on ideas that resistance around $0.8000 will be formidable.
The April crude oil futures contract (WTI) spent the month in February in a wide but clear trading range. The bottom around $47.50 was approached at the end of last week. The upper end of the range is near $55. Many participants are suggesting a key low is in place and appear to be better buyers on pullbacks. The MACDs are turning down. The slow Stochastics are falling but in neutral territory. The RSI is neutral. Prices need to rise above $51.50 to be anything noteworthy.
US 10-year Treasury yields rose from 1.64% at the start of February to a high of 2.16% on February 18. The push down to 1.92% at the end of last week nearly retraced 50% of the increase in yields. Key to the outlook is the US jobs report, which the ADP estimate steals much of the thunder. The yield can rise toward 2.07-2.10% ahead of the data.
The S&P 500 set new record highs on February 25 just shy of 2120. The MACDs and slow Stochastics warn of the loss of upside momentum. The RSI is more neutral. Since closing above 2100 on February 20, this has become support. Our reading of the technical condition suggests risk of a pullback into the 2080-2090 area, which would not damage the larger constructive tone.
Observations from the speculative positioning of the futures market:
1. For the second consecutive week, there were no significant position adjustments among speculators in the currency futures, which we define as a shift of at least 10k contracts in the gross position. The gross short euro position was the closest at 9.5k contracts were covered, leaving 223.2k open. The gross short euro position has fallen by about 21k contracts this month as the downside momentum faded.
2. To the extent that there was an overall pattern, speculators reduced gross short positions in the majors and added to them in the dollar-bloc and peso. Gross long positions were mostly added to, with the exception of the euro and the Australian dollar, both of which fell by less than 2k contracts. This is consistent with the consolidative tone seen in the spot market.
3. Although the week to week gross position adjustments in February has been modest, the adjustment have trended. This was the third week that the net short euro position has fallen. It has been driven more by short covering that bottom picking. The net short yen position has been reduced for six consecutive weeks. At -47.5k, it is half of the size it was at the start of the year. The net short sterling position extended its falling streak to five weeks. It has been halved since the end of January to 21.9k contracts.
4. The net short 10-year Treasury futures position swelled to 110k from 67.2k contracts. However, the gross short position hardly changed. It slipped by 500 contracts to 469.8k. What happened was the longs jumped out: The gross long position fell 43k contracts to 360k.
5. The net long speculative light sweet oil futures position fell by nearly 10% to 270k contracts. The bulls and bears saw things they liked. The bulls added 12.2k long contracts to give them almost 491k. The bears added 41.7k short contracts giving them 221k.
|
02-28-15 |
SII
US DOLLAR |
|
The Currency War Has Expanded to New Fronts Elliott Wave International
The "Currency War" that EWFF discussed in October and again in the most recent issue has expanded to new fronts, as world central banks fought to remain economically competitive by trying to push down the value of their currencies. Singapore became at least the ninth nation to "jump on the easing bandwagon" in January, employing loose monetary measures designed to reduce the value of the Singapore dollar.

Our long term bullish forecast for the U.S. dollar remains on track, and this month the Dollar Index jumped to 95.527, retracing 50% of its decline from 121.020 in July 2011 to 70.700 in March 2008. Short term, the rally is stretched like a taut piece of rope: prices have closed higher for 30 out of the past 39 weeks. Recently, a 10-day average of a poll of currency traders (courtesy trade-futures.com) showed 93.7% dollar bulls, an all-time record high. Also, Large Speculators in futures and options, who are generally trend-followers, now hold an all-time record net-long position of 72,897 contracts, as shown on the chart on the above. The extreme in these measures shows the strength of the rally but also reflects a trend that is ripe for a correction. The U.S. Dollar Index is at or near the end of Intermediate wave (3), which started in May 2014. Wave (4) will be a multi-month pullback that alleviates the aforementioned sentiment extremes and sets up the dollar for another wave of advance.
Finally, with the U.S. dollar rallying together with gold and U.S. Treasury bond prices, it is clear that investors are seeking money havens, assets they perceive will hold value the best in an increasingly risky environment. As deflationary forces intensify, it will become harder to find stable assets other than outright cash. |
02-21-15 |
SII
US DOLLAR |
|
Will the US Dollar Crash Stocks Like It Did in 2008? Graham Summers 02-18-15 Phoenix Capital Research
For 30+ years, Western countries have been papering over the decline in living standards by issuing debt. In its simplest rendering, sovereign nations spent more than they could collect in taxes, so they issued debt (borrowed money) to fund their various welfare schemes.
This was usually sold as a “temporary” issue. But as politicians have shown us time and again, overspending is never a temporary issue. This is compounded by the fact that the political process largely consists of promising various social spending programs/ entitlements to incentivize voters.
In the US today, a whopping 47% of American households receive some kind of Government benefit. This type of social spending is not temporary… this is endemic.
The US is not alone… Most major Western nations are completely bankrupt due to excessive social spending. And ALL of this spending has been fueled by bonds.
This is why Central Banks have done everything they can to stop any and all defaults from occurring in the sovereign bonds space. Indeed, when you consider the bond bubble everything Central Banks have done begins to make sense.
- Central banks cut interest rates to make these gargantuan debts more serviceable.
- Central banks want/target inflation because it makes the debts more serviceable and puts off the inevitable debt restructuring.
- Central banks are terrified of debt deflation (Fed Chair Janet Yellen herself admitted that oil’s recent deflation was economically positive) because it would burst the bond bubble and bankrupt sovereign nations.
So how will all of this play out?
The first real sign of trouble has already emerged. That sign pertains to the US Dollar.
Globally, the world is awash in borrowed money… most of it in US Dollars. The US Dollar carry trade is north of $9 trillion… literally than the economies of Germany and Japan COMBINED.
When you BORROW in US Dollars you are effectively SHORTING the US Dollar. So when the US Dollar rallies… you have to cover your SHORT or you blow up.
And the US Dollar has been rallying… HARD. Indeed, the move that began in July is already on par in scope with that which occurred during the 2008 meltdown:

This first wave imploded the price of Oil, numerous other commodities, and several emerging markets equities, most notably in Russia and Brazil.
However, the US markets are not immune to the move.
Some 87% of companies have guided below consensus expectations for next quarter. The stronger US Dollar is hurting profits… which are the single biggest driver of stock prices.
What happened the last time that stocks were strongly disconnected from reality… and the US Dollar began to rally hard?

Be prepared.
|
02-21-15 |
SII
US DOLLAR |
|
The real trade-weighted exchange rate index against major currencies has reached its highest level at the end of January since April 2003. The broader index is currently at a 69-month high. The major currency index includes six currencies (Euro, Yen, Canadian Dollar, Pound Sterling, Swedish Krona, and Swiss Franc). The broader definition includes 26 different currencies. The currency weights are based on yearly trade data. In order to calculate a "real" (i.e inflation-adjusted) exchange rate, the nominal exchange is multiplied by the ratio of US CPI index to the foreign currency CPI index.
The nominal trade-weighted exchange rate index by major currencies is at its highest level since May 2004, while the broader index is at its highest level since March 9th, 2009 (the infamous start to the current bull market).
Lastly, our purchasing power parity diffusion index has fallen to 0 for the first time since 2009. This means that on a purchasing power parity basis, nine currencies are currently overvalued versus the USD and nine currencies are undervalued versus the USD.
 |
02-21-15 |
SII
US DOLLAR |
|
FURTHER READING:
|
02-21-15 |
SII
US DOLLAR |
|
On an equal-weighted basis, the energy sector has still been the best performing sector in February. It is nearly 7% higher this month, however, it has been the worst performing sector so far this week (-1.5%).
MSCI World Index Performance By Sector
Only 14% of energy stocks are positive this year but shorter term momentum has improved. Unfortunately, it has improved to the point where momentum tends to stall out. 75% of energy stocks are now trading above its 50-day moving average. 80% tends to be an unsustainable level for very long.
Longer term momentum still looks pretty weak. Only 19% of energy stocks are trading above its 100-day moving average and only 9% of stocks are trading above its 200-day moving average.
Lastly, only 6% of stocks have a 50-day moving average trading above its 200-day moving average. This series needs to turn higher before we would feel confident that the bearish trend in energy stocks has turned. In the chart below we chart this series against the six month returns of the MSCI Energy sector.
|
02-14-15 |
SII |
|
We had a big bounce in cyclical sectors last week in the MSCI World Index. On an equal-weighted basis, the energy sector outperformed the MSCI World Index by over 6% last week. The second best performing sector was financials (+3.12%) and the the third best performing sector was materials (+2.78%). The bottom of the leader board is made up of counter-cyclical sectors. Utilities was the only sector that finished the week in the red (-1.96%), while consumer staples (+0.59%) and health care (+0.70%) rounded out the laggards. Year-to-date, health care remains the best performing sector (+4.08%) and energy (+0.36) has finally moved out of last place and into positive territory for the year. Utilities (-0.57%) has been the worst performing sector so far in 2015.
MSCI World Index Performance By Sector
MSCI World Index Performance By Sector
The performance story in the emerging markets last week was similar, it just wasn't as extreme. Energy (+3.16%) was the best performing sector followed closely by materials (+3.14%). However, the third best performing sector was a counter-cyclical sector. Consumer staples ended the week 1.83% higher. The average stock in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index ended the week 1.02% higher. The worst performing sector last week was health care (-2.40%) followed by utilities (-2.15%). Year-to-date, information technology (+5.23%) is the best performing sector followed by energy (+4.18%) and consumer staples (+3.5%). Utilities is by far the worst performing sector in the emerging markets. It is down 5.27% so far this year while the second worst performing sector, financials, is only down 0.75%.
MSCI Emerging Markets Index Performance By Sector
MSCI Emerging Markets Index Performance By Sector
|
02-14-15 |
SII |
|
|
01-26-15 |
THESIS |
FINANCIAL REPRESSION

|
FINANCIAL REPRESSION - Negative Real Rates Coming
Get Ready For Negative Interest Rates In The US 01-24-15 ZH
With Fed mouthpiece Jon Hilsenrath warning - in no lesser status-quo narrative-deliverer than The Wall Street Journal - that The ECB's actions (and pre-emptive collapse in the EUR) means the U.S. economy must deal with a rapidly strengthening dollar that will make American goods more expensive abroad, potentially slowing both U.S. growth and inflation; and Treasury Secretary Lew coming out his crypt to mention "unfair FX moves," it appears The Fed (and powers that be) are worrying about King Dollar. This suggests, as Mises Canada's Patrick Barron predicts, the Fed will start charging negative interest rates on bank reserve accounts as the final tool in the war on savings and wealth in order to spur the Keynesian goal of increasing “aggregate demand”. If savers won’t spend their money, the government will take it from them.
As The Wall Street Journal explains,
The European Central Bank’s launch of an aggressive program this week to buy more than €1 trillion in bonds poses important tests for the U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve.
Europe’s new program of money printing—and the resulting fall in the euro—means the U.S. economy must deal with a rapidly strengthening dollar that will make American goods more expensive abroad.
The stronger dollar could slow both U.S. growth and inflation, giving the Fed some incentive to hold off on its plan to raise short-term interest rates later this year from near zero.
...
A stronger dollar has three important implications for the U.S. economy, markets and policy makers.
- First, it tamps down inflation just as the Fed is trying to raise inflation closer to 2%.
- Second, it hurts exports and therefore economic growth.
- Lastly, the attraction of U.S. financial assets could heat up markets just as regulators keep watch for dangerous asset bubbles.
...
U.S. officials have been playing down that scenario, and, more broadly, resisting talk of a global currency war—competitive devaluations by countries eager to keep their currencies as low as possible to protect exports; but “The Fed faces a challenge having to navigate some pretty intense cross currents,” said Bruce Kasman, chief economist for J.P. Morgan Chase.
The U.S., in effect, is importing some of the world’s downward inflation pressure through currency movements.
Treasury Secretray Lew pipes in...
- *LEW SAYS UNFAIR FX MOVES TO DRAW SCRUTINY FROM U.S.
- *LEW SAYS STRONG DOLLAR IS GOOD FOR AMERICA
* * *
And Patrick Barron predicts (via Mises Canada)...
I predict that the Fed will start charging negative interest rates on bank reserve accounts, which will ripple through the markets and result in negative interest rates on savings at banks.
I make this prediction only because it is the logical action of the Keynesian managers of our economy and monetary policy.
Our exporters will scream that they can’t sell goods overseas, due to the stronger dollar.
So, what is the Fed’s option? Follow the lead of Switzerland and Denmark and impose negative interest rates in order to drive down the foreign exchange rate of the dollar.
It is the final tool in the war on savings and wealth in order to spur the Keynesian goal of increasing “aggregate demand”.
If savers won’t spend their money, the government will take it from them
|
01-26-15 |
THESIS |
FINANCIAL REPRESSION

|
JAPANESE 2 YEAR GOES NEGATIVE

GERMAN 2 YEAR GOES NEGATIVE

30 YEAR HEADING STEADILY SOUTH

|
01-26-15 |
THESIS |
FINANCIAL REPRESSION

|
US DOLLAR - Beggar-thy-Neighbor
The $9 Trillion US Dollar Carry Trade is Blowing Up 01-23-15 Phoenix Capital Research
The US Dollar rally, combined with the ECB’s policies are at risk of blowing up a $9 trillion carry trade.
When the Fed cut interest rates to zero in 2008, it flooded the system with US Dollars. The US Dollar is the reserve currency of the world. NO matter what country you’re in (with few exceptions) you can borrow in US Dollars.
And if you can borrow in US Dollars at 0.25%... and put that money into anything yielding more… you could make a killing.
A hedge fund in Hong Kong could borrow $100 million, pay just $250,000 in interest and plow that money into Brazilian Reals which yielded 11%... locking in a $9.75 million return.
This was the strictly financial side of things. On the economics side, Governments both sovereign and local borrowed in US Dollars around the globe to fund various infrastructure and municipal projects.
Simply put, the US Government was practically giving money away and the world took notice, borrowing Dollars at a record pace. Today, the global carry trade (meaning money borrowed in US Dollars and invested in other assets) stands at over $9 TRILLION (larger than the economy of France and Brazil combined).
This worked while the US Dollar was holding steady. But in the summer of last year (2014), the US Dollar began to breakout of a multi-year wedge pattern:

Why does this matter?
Because the minute the US Dollar began to rally aggressively, the global US Dollar carry trade began to blow up. It is not coincidental that oil commodities, and emerging market stocks took a dive almost immediately after this process began.

This process is not over, not by a long shot. As anyone who invested during the Peso crisis or Asian crisis can tell you, when carry trades blow up, the volatility can be EXTREME.
The market drop in October was just the start. Once the US Dollar rally really begins picking up steam, we could very well see a crash.
|
01-24-15 |
US DOLLAR |
|
Jeffrey Snider via Alhambra Investment Partners

- The price of gold may be telling us that increasingly financial agents are at least increasingly unsure about the future. Whether or not the Fed actually gets to “tighten”; it may not matter either way and end up in the same disastrous condition regardless.
- It isn’t really about interest rates or “inflation”, obviously as gold is rising as inflation “expectations” dramatically sink here, so much as gold is insurance against central banks being wrong.
- That seems to be the common theme all over the world ever since June when the ECB placed its desperation and impotence on full display. Everything that has occurred since then has only confirmed the monetary illusion being exactly that, including the US and its central bank’s place at really the central point of the miscalculated insanity.
|
01-24-15 |
US DOLLAR |
|
DRIVER$ - Sudden market swings, dollar rise expose emerging market vulnerability: BIS
Sudden market swings, dollar rise expose emerging market vulnerability: BIS 12-07-14 Reuters

Traffic flows in front of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basel December 5, 2013. Credit: Reuters/Arnd Wiegmann
(Reuters) - Sudden swings in financial markets recently suggest they are becoming more fragile and sensitive to unexpected events, the global organization of central banks said on Sunday, warning that a rising U.S. dollar could have a "profound impact" on emerging markets in particular.
MSCI's all-country world stock index is hovering around multi-year highs after rebounding from sell-offs in August and October.
The downturns were triggered by uncertainty over the global economic outlook and monetary policy, as well as geopolitical tensions, and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said the sharp and sudden dips pointed to frailty in the markets.
"These abrupt market movements (in October) were even more pronounced than similar developments in August, when a sudden correction in global financial markets was quickly succeeded by renewed buoyant market conditions," the BIS said.
"This suggests that more than a quantum of fragility underlies the current elevated mood in financial markets," it said in its quarterly review. "Global equity markets plummeted in early August and mid-October. Mid-October's extreme intra-day price movements underscore how sensitive markets have become to even small surprises."
The comments followed the organization's warning in September that financial asset prices were at "elevated" levels and market volatility remained "exceptionally subdued" thanks to ultra-loose monetary policies being implemented by central banks around the world.
Since then, the U.S. Federal Reserve has brought its monthly bond-purchase program to an expected end. However, Japan's central bank has expanded its massive stimulus spending while China unexpectedly cut interest rates, adding to stimulus measures from the European Central Bank.
These divergent monetary policies [US' TAPER ending and Japan's Massive new stimulus], coupled with the dollar's recent appreciation, could have a profound impact on the global economy, particularly in emerging markets where many companies have large dollar-denominated liabilities, the BIS said.
"It's the warning that the rising dollar could bring more (emerging markets) trouble in its wake - as it did in the 1990s - that is going to challenge FX markets tomorrow morning while we're all thinking about what the U.S. non-farm payroll data mean for Fed rate hike timing," Societe Generale's currency strategist Kit Juckes told clients in a note on Sunday.
Juckes was referring to the larger-than-expected 321,000 rise in U.S. jobs in November reported on Friday, data which sent the dollar to multi-year highs against the yen and euro.
Separately, the BIS report said that international banking activity expanded for the second quarter running between end-March and end-June.
Cross-border claims of BIS reporting banks rose by $401 billion. The annual growth rate of cross-border claims rose to 1.2 percent in the year to end-June, the first move into positive territory since late 2011.
(Editing by Pravin Char and Rosalind Russell)
FT HEADLINE 12-09-14
|
12-09-14 |
DRIVERS |
|
DRIVER$ -Dollar surge endangers global debt edifice, warns BIS
Dollar surge endangers global debt edifice, warns BIS 12-07-14 Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, FT
Bank for International Settlements concerned about underlying health of world economy as dollar loans to emerging markets increase rapidly

BIS warned that dollar loans to Chinese banks and companies are rising at annual rate of 47pc and now stand at $1.1 trillion Photo: Oliver Yao / Alamy
Off-shore lending in US dollars has soared to $9 trillion and poses a growing risk to both emerging markets and the world's financial stability, the Bank for International Settlements has warned.
The Swiss-based global watchdog said dollar loans to Chinese banks and companies are rising at annual rate of 47pc. They have jumped to $1.1 trillion from almost nothing five years ago.
Cross-border dollar credit has ballooned to
- BRAZIL: $456bn in Brazil,
- MEXICO: $381bn in Mexico.
- RUSSIA: External debt has reached $715bn in Russia, mostly in dollars.
A chunk of China's borrowing is disguised as intra-firm financing. This replicates practices by German industrial companies in the 1920s, which hid their real level of exposure as the 1929 debt trauma was building up.
"To the extent that these flows are driven by financial operations rather than real activities, they could give rise to financial stability concerns," said the BIS in its quarterly report.
"More than a quantum of fragility underlies the current elevated mood in financial markets," it warned. Officials are disturbed by the "risk-on, risk-off, flip-flopping" by investors. Some of the violent moves lately go beyond stress seen in earlier crises, a sign that markets may be dangerously stretched and that many fund managers do not really believe their own Goldilocks narrative.
"Mid-October’s extreme intraday price movements underscore how sensitive markets have become to even small surprises. On 15 October, the yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell almost 37 basis points, more than the drop on 15 September 2021 when Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy."
"These fluctuations were large relative to actual economic and policy surprises, as the only notable negative piece of news that day was the release of somewhat weaker than expected retail sales data for the US one hour before the event," it said.
The BIS said 55pc of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) now being issued are based on leveraged loans, an "unprecedented level".
This raises eyebrows because CDOs were pivotal in the 2008 crash. "Activity in the leveraged loan markets even surpassed the levels recorded before the crisis: average quarterly announcements during the year to end-September 2014 were $250bn," it said.
BIS officials are worried that tightening by the US Federal Reserve will transmit a credit shock through East Asia and the emerging world, both by raising the cost of borrowing and by pushing up the dollar.
"The appreciation of the dollar against the backdrop of divergent monetary policies may, if persistent, have a profound impact on the global economy. A continued depreciation of the domestic currency against the dollar could reduce the creditworthiness of many firms, potentially inducing a tightening of financial conditions," it said.
The dollar index (DXY) has surged 12pc since late June to 89.36, smashing through its 30-year downtrend line. The currency has risen 55pc against the Russian rouble and 18pc against Brazil's real over the same period.
Hyun Song Shin, the BIS's head of research, said the world's central banks still hold over 60pc of their reserves in dollars. This ratio has changed remarkably little in forty years, but the overall level has soared -- from $1 trillion to $12 trillion just since 2000.

Cross-border lending in dollars has tripled to $9 trillion in a decade. Some $7 trillion of this is entirely outside the American regulatory sphere.
"Neither a borrower nor a lender is a US resident. The role that the US dollar plays in debt contracts is very important. It is a global currency, and no other currency has this role," he said.
The implication is that there is no lender-of-last resort standing behind trillions of off-shore dollar bank transactions. This increases the risks of a chain-reaction if it ever goes wrong.
China's central bank has ample dollar reserves to bail out its companies - should it wish to do so - but the jury is out on Brazil, Russia, and other countries.
This flaw in the global system may be tested as the Fed prepares to raise interest rates for the first time in seven years. The US economy is growing at a blistering pace of 3.9pc. Non-farm payrolls surged by 321,000 in November and wage growth is at last picking up.
Two years ago the Fed expected unemployment to be 7.4pc at this stage. In fact it is 5.8pc. The Fed's new “optimal control” model suggest that raise rates may rise sooner and faster than markets expect. This has the makings of a global shock.
The great unknown is whether the current cycle of Fed tightening will lead to the same sort of stress seen in the Latin American debt crisis in the early 1980s or the East Asia/Russia crisis in the late 1990s.
This time governments have far less dollar debt, but corporate dollar debt has replaced it, with mounting excesses in the non-bank bond markets. Emerging market bond issuance in dollars has jumped by $550bn since 2009. "This trend could have important financial stability implications," it said.
BIS officials are concerned that the risks may be just as great in this episode, though the weak links may not be where we think they are. Just as generals fight the last war, regulators have be fretting chiefly about bank leverage since the Lehman crisis.
Yet the new threat may lie in non-leveraged investments by asset managers and pension funds funnelling vast sums of excess capital around the world, especially into emerging markets.
- Many of these are so-called "macro-tourists" chasing yield, in some cases with little grasp of global geopolitics.
- Studies suggest that they have a low tolerance for losses.
- They engage in clustering and crowd behaviours, and
- Are apt to pull-out en masse, risking a bad feedback-loop.
This could prove to be today's systemic danger. "If we rely too much on the familiar mechanisms, we may be missing the new vulnerabilities building up," said Mr Shin in a speech to the Brookings Institution last week.

The BIS has particular authority since its job is to track global lending. It was the only major body to warn of serious trouble before the Great Recession - and did so clearly, without the usual ifs and buts.
It now warns that the world is in many ways even more stretched today than it was in 2008, since emerging markets have been drawn into the global debt morass as well, and some have hit the limits of easy catch-up growth.
Debt levels in rich countries have jumped by 30 percentage points since the Lehman crisis to 275pc of GDP, and by the same amount to 175pc in emerging markets. The world has exhausted almost all of its buffer
WE WARNED OF THE US$ CARRY BOOMERANG IN 2013

|
12-09-14 |
DRIVERS |
|
CURRENCY WARS - A Strong US$ Means Weaker Russian Oil Prices
The Strong Dollar is the new "Tank" in this War


Following the sanctions imposed by the EU and the US, the Russian economy has taken a serious hit. The ruble is in free fall, inflation is way above target, and falling oil prices have put immense pressure on the economy. Two of Russia's largest state financial institutions being sanctions, Sberbank and VTB, both own real estate in Moscow City (see below).
RUSSIA ON VERGE OF ECONOMIC RECESSION
Russian Recession Risk Seen at Record as Oil Saps Economy BL
Russian oil oligarch: '$60 and below is possible' Reuters
Russia’s Oil Giant Battles Debt After $55 Billion Deal BL
Why Russia Said 'No Deal' to OPEC on Cutting Oil Production BW
Merkel Said to Reject Ukraine NATO Bid as Rousing Tension BL
Merkel Will Blink First, Not Putin Mish
Notes on Russia Outside The Box
Cheap-Oil Era Tilts Geopolitical Power to U.S. BL
Oil and gold price plunge does not signal a global recession, experts say Guardian
Oil industry risks trillions of 'stranded assets' on US-China climate deal Pritchard
Saudi oil policy uncertainty unleashes the conspiracy theorists Reuters
Why Putin is buying so much gold CNBC
Russia Delivers a New Shock to Crimean Business: Forced Nationalization BW
Putin's Reach:Merkel Concerned about Russian Influence in the Balkans Spiegel
Putin Said to Plan Early G-20 Exit as Ukraine Casts Shadow BL
Oil Slick NA Outlook (BMO)
The Russians Have Persuaded The Chinese To Bail Out Their Oil Industry BInsider
Are Russian ETFs Signaling A Potential Crash? Nasdaq
Ukraine Tells Army to Prepare for Battle as Tensions Rise BL
Stronger dollar could mean $30 oil: Pro CNBC
U.S. Shale Boom Masks Threats to World Oil Supply, IEA Says BL
Russians buy dollars, hoard cash on rouble fears Reuters
President Vladimir Putin blames currency woes on speculators and the West.
RUSSIA FORCED TO FLOAT RUBLE
Amid currency gyrations, Russia floats ruble AP
Stakes are high as US plays the oil card against Iran and Russia Guardian
Putin seeks to reassure world amid 'perfect storm' CNBC
Putin Is Losing Out to China in Central Asia's Latest 'Great Game' BW
Ruble Slumps to Record as Russia Moves Closer to Free Float BL
Black Dog: Are Plunging Oil Prices a Positive or a Negative? Sonders
It’s All About the (Oil) Base BMO
Russia takes emergency steps to defend ruble, tame inflation Fortune
HOW WILL FUNDING WORK FOR $12B PROJECTS LIKE "MOSCOW CITY"?
Finance More: Moscow Russia Putin Global Economy Russia Now Has 'A $12 Billion Reminder' Of Its Money Problems 11-26-14 BI

|
11-29-14 |
US$ |
|
USD REPORT - TRIGGER$
Download PDF |
11-22-14 |
US$ |
|
TO TOP |
Learn more about Gold & Silver-Backed, Absolute Return Alternative Investments
with these complimentary educational materials |
|